Page 20 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 20

Hindrance to Day Care Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in India
                   Table 2: Factors affecting the dischargeability of patients at 6 hours
                                                  p value after logistic               Significance using logistic
                   Factors            p value     regression        Odds ratio (95% CI)  regression
                   Age                0.007       0.901             0.997 (0.947–1.049)  Not significant
                   Acute cholecystitis  0.004     0.059             0.074 (0.005–1.103)  Significant
                   DM                 0.001       0.455             0.456 (0.058–3.578)  Not significant
                   HTN                0.005       0.317             0.387 (0.060–2.485)  Not significant
                   Duration of surgery  0.001     0.023             0.976 (0.955–0.997)  Significant
                   ASA                0.001       0.971             1.037 (0.153–7.022)  Not significant
                   Difficulty         <0.001      0.140             0.442 (0.149–1.306)  Not significant
                   Use of drain       <0.001      0.214             0.270 (0.034–2.129)  Not significant
                   DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; ASA, The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system


            Table 3: Factors affecting the dischargeability of patients at 24 hours  of patient over 65 years [p = 0.021; odds ratio (OR) = 2.225; 95%
            Factors          p value         Significance      confidence interval (CI), 1.130–4.381] as a predictive factor for
                                                                                             5
            Difficulty       0.008           Significant       overnight admission or failed discharge.  In another study by Psaila
                                                               et al., age over 50 years was one of the factors which adversely
            Use of drain     0.005           Significant                                  6
                                                               affected the same-day discharge.  Contrary to these finding, a
                                                               study on DCLCs in elderly showed that ambulatory LCs are safe in
                                                                                    7
                                                               elderly patients (>65 years).  In our study, age was not a significant
                                                               factor associated with dischargeability at 6 hours, after regression
                                                               analysis. This is an indicator that even in elderly patients who have
                                                               no other comorbidities, DCLCs might be safe.
                                                                  In the study by Chauhan et al. although ASA grade III and IV
                                                               were excluded, four of their day care cases required admission due
                                                                                                     8
                                                               to reasons like hypertension, COPD, and diabetes.  They were of
                                                               the opinion that these are dynamic diseases and likely to change
                                                               between the interval between initial preanesthetic assessment
                                                               and final surgery. In our study, although independently ASA score,
                                                               diabetes, and hypertension had a significant association, and these
                                                               variables did not show significant association after regression
                                                               analysis. This might be due the interdependency of the variables
                                                               such as age, hypertension, diabetes, and ASA score. A good initial
                                                               preanesthetic evaluation and stringent patient selection for DCLCs
                                                               should be followed to avoid potentially dangerous outcomes and
                                                               decrease the number of cancellations of day care surgeries.
                                                                  In our study, 53 (60.23%) patients had easy surgery, 25 (28.41%)
            Fig. 1: Factors delaying discharge at 24 hours
                                                               patients had moderately difficult, and 10 (11.36%) patients had
                                                               very difficult surgery. Difficulty of surgery independently had a
            at our institution, all the patients were assessed at 6 hours for   significant association with dischargeability 6 hours. The lack of the
            dischargeability and then followed up till 24 hours till their discharge   significant association after regression analysis may be due to its
            to see if they developed any complications which could have been   association with duration of surgery. Lledó et al. in their study had
            a reason for readmission if at all these patients were discharged at   similar findings and identified “dissection difficulty” as one of the
            6 hours as day care. None of the patients who were dischargeable   predictive factors related to overnight stay in DCLCs. 9
            at 6 hours developed any complication during their period of stay   Use of drain had a significant association with dischargeability
            in the hospital and continued to remain dischargeable at 24 hours.  at 6 hours in the initial analysis. This might be attributed to the
               Of the total 88 patients analyzed, 57 (64.7%) patients were   increased pain experienced and the difficulty to ambulate in the
            dischargeable at 6 hours and 78 (88.6%) patients dischargeable   patients with drain in situ. After regression analysis, the association
            at 24 hours. This means that 65% of all the laparoscopic   was found to be not significant. This lack of significance after
            cholecystectomies can be performed as DCLCs.       regression analysis might be due to the association between
               We found age (p value—0.007), acute cholecystitis (0.004),   difficulty of surgery and usage of drain. We had used drain almost
            diabetes mellitus (p value—0.001), hypertension (p value—0.005),   routinely for all the difficult cases. The nondischargeability in
            ASA score (p value—0.001), duration of surgery (0.001), difficulty of   patients with drain might be mainly due to the difficulty of the
            surgery (p value < 0.001), and use of drain (p value < 0.001) to have   surgery rather than the presence of drain.
            significant association with dischargeability at 6 hours. After logistic   The mean operative time in our study was 97.39 minutes (SD =
            regression analysis, only duration of surgery and acute cholecystitis   38.03). In our study, duration of surgery was a statistically significant
            were found to have a significant association (Table 2).  independent factor associated with dischargeability at 6 hours.
               Previous studies stated age as a factor for failed discharge   One of the studies had showed operation duration superior to
                   5,6
                                                                                                            5
            of DCLCs.  In the study by Lledó et al. (n = 410), they found age   60 minutes to be a predictive factor to overnight admission.  From
             18   World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 13 Issue 1 (January–April 2020)
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25