Page 29 - WJOLS
P. 29

WJOLS


                                                      Is there an Ideal Port Position for Laparoscopic Urological Procedures?

             Another approach through the retroperitoneal space is  in techniques and manoeuvres unique to single site surgeries
          obtained through a 15 to 20 mm incision just below the tip  are employed. 12
          of the 12th rib and the secondary ports are then placed along     During laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) nephrec­
          the inferior border of the costal margin using digital palpation  tomy, a periumbilical incision is made to the rectus fascia.
          through the balloon dilated incision site. After digital place­  The peritoneum is entered with an extra­long trocar. After
          ment of all the secondary ports, the primary balloon­tip port  pneumoperitoneum, another trocar, is placed 1 to 1.5 cm
          is inserted. The posterior secondary 12 mm port is placed at  caudal and at the 4 o’clock position to the extra­long trocar,
          the lateral border of the paraspinal muscle along the inferior  eventually functioning as the camera port. A 12 mm port
          border of the 12th rib. An anterior port is placed near the  is inserted 1.5 cm caudal to the second trocar, resulting in
          anterior axillary line, just below the inferior tip of the 11th  triangular configuration. A fourth 12 mm standard length
          rib. An additional 5 mm port may be placed, on the midaxi­  trocar is placed 1 cm cephalad to the umbilical protuber­
          llary line at or above the level of the superior iliac crest, and  ance, through which liver or splenic retraction and control
          used for retraction and suction. Often a 12 mm port is placed  of the renal upper pole and adrenal gland is achieved. 13
          at Petit’s triangle just above the midportion of the iliac crest
          and a fingerbreadth superior to the iliac crest. 8  Natural Orifice Transluminal
                                                              Endoscopic nephrectomy
          Hand-assisted Laparoscopic nephrectomy
                                                              Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES),
          The hand­assisted device for right renal surgery could be  with the objective of incision free abdominal surgery
          located at and just below the umbilicus on the midline.  through natural orifices (mouth, vagina and rectum) has
          Alter natively, on the right side, the hand port may be placed  been described. Although, there were reports on successful
          as a Gibson incision in the right lower quadrant. A port is  completion of six laparoscopic transvaginal nephrectomies
          placed on the midclavicular line just above the superior  using conventional instruments in a porcine model, there
          iliac crest; the laparoscope is positioned at this port site.  were note of limitations of the laparoscopic instruments

          A 12 mm port is placed two fingerbreadths below the costal  making the procedure cumbersome and time consuming.
          margin on the midclavicular line, to accommodate the Endo­  Clayman et al reported their experience with single port
          GIA stapling device. A 5 mm port is placed on the midline  NOTES transvaginal nephrectomy and encountered similar
          in the epigastric region for placement of an instrument to  difficulty until a purpose built multi lumen operating instru­
          retract the liver superiorly and medially. 8        ments were made available. 14
             Conversely, on the left the incision for the hand­assisted     Hybrid NOTES in which two natural orifices are used
          laparoscopic (HAL) device is located on the midline, at and  for approaches has also been described and tried for neph­
          above the umbilicus on the midclavicular line just above  rectomies. Transvaginal NOTES hybrid combined with
          the superior iliac crest, a 10 mm port placed for positioning  either transgastric or transvesical nephrectomy, transvesical­
          of the 10 mm, 30º laparoscope. The laparoscope may then  transgastric have all been described. 15
          be used for visualization of the HAL device incision. An
          additional 12 mm working port is placed on the midclavi­  Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty
          cular line 2 fingerbreadths below the costal margin. Retraction  Standard port placement described as ports placed in the
          of the kidney laterally may be facilitated by an instrument  upper and lower quadrant midclavicular lines and the
          placed through a 5 mm port in the midaxillary line, midway  camera port placed near the umbilicus. An assistant port is
          between the costal margin and superior iliac crest. 8  placed in the suprapubic midline. 16
                                                                 Another approach with a primary port at 2.5 cm to the
          Laparoendoscopic Single Site nephrectomy            right of umbilicus, a 5 mm port midway between the primary
          Since the advent of laparoscopy, urologists have tried  port and right costal margin and, on right midclavicular line,
          to minimize scars and improve cosmesis, leading to the  and another 5 mm port midway between the anterosuperior
          progression to laparoendoscopic single site urological  iliac spine and the umbilicus was used while the patient
          procedure. Access is usually gain through the umbilicus,  was placed in the 45 left lateral position. Fourth flank port
          but others include transabdominal or retroperitoneal flank  is placed for retraction. 17
          approach, a suprapubic or mini­Pfannenstiel approach or
          Gibson incisions. 12                                LESS Pyeloplasty
             Either a specialized port or cluster conventional port  The patient is positioned in a modified flank fashion, and
          can be used to obtain access. Conventional laparoscopic  a 2.5 cm incision is made within the umbilical dimple to
          techniques are generally followed, although modifications  conceal the scar. After insufflation of the abdomen, three
          World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2014;7(2):74-87                                 75
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34