Page 24 - WJOLS
P. 24

Samir A Ammar et al
          ES], pancreatitis (upper abdominal pain, elevated leukocyte  STATISTICAL AnALySIS
          count/CRP, elevated amylase at least 3 times normal, and   Statistical analyses were performed using the Statis tical
          elevated lipase levels), and cholecystitis (pain in the right   Package for Social Sciences, version 16.0 (SPSS Inc,
          upper quadrant, fever and leukocytosis, in the absence of   Chicago, IL, uSA). Data are expressed as mean ± standard
          hyperbilirubinemia).                                deviation (SD) for continuous variables and percentages
             All patients were subjected to complete evaluation   for categorical variables. Student t-test was used to analyze
          through a detailed history, complete physical examination,   continuous variables, whereas chi-square test was used to
          laboratory investigations, and imaging study (uS and/or   analyze categorical variables. p-value is considered statisti-
          MRCP). Randomization was done using computer-       cally significant when less than 0.05.
          gene rated random number sequences. ERCP was performed
          for all patients under general anesthesia. If CBD stones   RESuLTS
          were found on endoscopic cholangiography, ES was per-
          formed and the stones were extracted using either Dormia  During the period of the study, out of 65 patients recruited,
          basket or balloon catheter. Mechanical lithotripsy was done  60 patients were included in the final analysis. Five patients
          in cases of large stones. Occlusion cholangiography was  were complicated by mild post ERCP pancreatitis, 3 in group
          done at the end of every ERCP to ensure that no missed  I and 2 in group II, and excluded from the final analysis.
          stones.                                             Patients with acute pancreatitis were treated successfully
             Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done in both groups  with conservative treatment. No other post ERCP complica-
          by the same surgical team using the standard four-port  tions were reported.
          technique. In case of difficulty or complication, conversion     Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 31
          to open cholecystectomy was done by a subcostal incision.  patients in group I and in 29 patients in group II. The age
          The decision for conversion could only be taken by the most  ranged from 25 to 65 years (mean 46 ± 12.8). Both groups
          experienced surgeon in the operating team.          were matched to each other as regard age, sex, laboratory
             Primary outcome was the conversion rate from laparo-  and uS characteristics (Table 1).
          s copic to open cholecystectomy. Secondary outcomes     No mortality was recorded in either group. The mean
          were duration of LC (measured from first incision to last  duration of surgery was longer in group 2 than in group 1
          skin suture), postoperative morbidity and hospital stay.  (48.5 ± 11.6) vs (43 ± 10.4) but the result did not reach
          Complications were recorded during the hospital stay and  statistical significance. The conversion rates to an open
          at the outpatient clinic, which every patient visited after   procedure were 6.4 and 10.3% in groups I and II respec-
          2 to 4 weeks. All patients were followed up for 6 months  tively (Table 2). The main reasons for conversion were
          and were instructed to notify the surgeon if there were any  dense adhesions in Callot’s triangle, unclear anatomy and
          symptoms suggesting biliary complication.           bleeding from the gallbladder bed. The hospital stay was

                                                Table 1: Patients’ characteristics
               Variables                               Group I               Group II               p-value
               Number of cases                         31                    29
               Age (years) (mean ± SD)                 46.2 ± 11.2           47.3 ± 11.1            0.7
               Sex (female/male)                       21/10                 21/8                   0.69
               Proportion of abnormal LFTs (%)         25/31 (80%)           26/29 (89%)            0.3
               US findings
               •    Dilated CBD diameter (˃ 8 mm)      29/31 (93.5%)         24/29 (8.2.7%)         0.19
               •    CBD stone (s)                      28/31 (90%)           23/29 (79.3%)          0.23
            LFTs: Liver function tests

                                                  Table 2: Patients’ outcomes
               Variables                              Group I                Group II              p-value
               Operative time (min) (mean ± SD)       43 ± 10.4              48.5 ± 11.6           0.057
               Conversion rate                        6.4%                   10.3%                 0.58
               Length of hospital stay (days) (mean ± SD)  2.5 ± 1.5         4 ± 2                 0.001
               Postoperative complications
               •    Bleeding                          0                      1/29 (3.4%)
               •    Bile leak                         1/31 (3.2%)            0
               •    Wound infection                   0                      1/29 (3.4%)
          70
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29