Page 35 - Laparoscopic Journal - WJOLS

WJOLS

A Comparative Study of Single Incision vs Conventional Four Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
time, blood loss and long­term outcomes also constitute a 5. Petrostos AC, Molinelli BM. Single incision multiport laparo-
weakness. It is hoped that future studies would address endoscopic surgery (SIMPLE): early evaluation of SIMPLE
this inherent challenge. cholecystectomy in a community setting. Surg Endosc 2009
Nov;23(11):2631­2637.
CoNCLuSIoN 6. SAGES: conventional four port (incision) laparoscopic chole­
cystectomy; early report of the first prospective randomized
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to sham controlled trial.
offer prospects for shorter hospital and early return to 7. Qiu Z, Sun J, Pu Y, Jiang T, Cao J, Wu W. Learning curve
work compared to conventional 4PLC. Patients under­ of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystec­
going either SILC or 4PLC appear to have similar anal­ tomy. A preliminary study of 80 selected patients with
gesic requirement. Extrapolating this to pain difference benign gall­bladder disease. World J Surg 2011 Sep;35(9):
2092­2101.
between the two surgical technique, however, require 8. Marker SR, Karthikesalingam A, et al. Conventional multi­
caution. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy as port cholecystectomy; a systemic review and meta­analysis.
a surgical technique is, however, feasible and promising Surgical endoscopy 2012;26(5):1205­1213.
for treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis. 9. Brittney LC, Veronica EC, David TA. Proc (Bayl Univ med
Cent) 2012 Oct;25(4):319­323.
REFERENCES 10. Robert KE, Solomon D, Duffy AJ, Bell RL. Single incision
laparoscopic cholecystectomy; a surgeons initial experience
1. Pan MX, Jian ZS, Cheng Y, Xu XP, Zhang Z, et al. Single
incision versus three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a with 56 consecutive cases and a review of the literature.
prospective randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2013 J Gastroinyest Surg 2010 Mar;14(3):506-510.
Jan 21;19(3):394­398. 11. Davidsons BR. Fewer than four ports versus four ports for
2. Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Data­base Syst Rev
laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systemic review. Surg 2014 Feb 20;2.
Endosc 2011 Feb;25(2):367­377. 12. Araoye MO. Research methodology with statistics for health
3. Lianguan G, Chhanghuan S, Jianfen B. Single incision versus workers and social sciences. Nathudex Publishers 2004;
conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes. A meta­ 115­120, Ilorin, Nigeria.
analysis of randomized control trials: plos one 8(10): e 76530. 13. Cusherie A. How I do it. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
4. Prasad A, Mukherjee KA, Kaul S, Kaur M. Post operative pain JR Coll Surg Edin 44, 1999 June;187­192.
after cholecystectomy; conventional versus single incision 14. Brittney LC, Veronica EC, David TA. Single incision laparos­
laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Minim Access Surg 2011 copic cholecystectomy versus traditional four port cholecys­
Jan-Mar;7(1):24-27. tectomy Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2012;25(4):319­323.

World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2015;8(2):62-67 67