Page 16 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 16

Roshan Zeirideen Zaid
             In the hysteroscopy procedure, the surface is coagu-  sarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche
                                                       8
          lated, distal rim resected, 24,30,31  or polyps removed.  The   development. Hum Reprod 2015 Dec;30(12):2695-2702.
          randomized controlled trial (RCT) by Vevroot compared     9.  Florioa P, Filippeschi M, Moncinia I, Marrac E, Franchinid M,
          hysteroscopy with other methods in the control group    Gubbini G. Hysteroscopic treatment of the cesarean-induced
                                                                  isthmocele in restoring infertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol
          (Combined oral contraceptive pills (COC), Intrauterine   2012 Mar;24(3):180-186.
          device (IUD), and hysterectomy). They concluded that this     10.  Chazotte C, Cohen WR. Catastrophic complications of previ-
          is not good for defects that are too thin (less than 3 mm)   ous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990 Sep;163(3):
          since the bladder injury/perforation is too high; also this   738-742.
          cannot be used for niches more than 5 mm. They found     11.  Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta previa/accreta and
                                                                  prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1985 Jul;66(1):89-92.
          that quality of life and sex life improved following the     12.  OuYang Z, Yin Q, Xu Y, Ma Y, Zhang Q, Yu Y. Heterotopic
          procedure; they have not looked into the fertility outcome.   cesarean scar pregnancy: Diagnosis, treatment, and progno-
          Also hysteroscope has the capacity to only coagulate the   sis. J Ultrasound Med 2014 Sep;33(9):1533-1537.
          superficial vessels, not the deep ones, so possibility of     13.  Perez-Medina T, Sancho-Sauco J, Rios M, Pereira A, Argila N,
          recurrence or converting to open or laparoscopy surgery   Cabezas E, Cayuela E. Hysteroscopy in pregnancy-related
          is always there if the bleeding becomes heavy. Prospec-  conditions: Descriptive analysis in 273 patients. J Minim
                                                                  Invasive Gynecol 2014 May-Jun;21(3):417-425.
                                                         32
          tive and retrospective studies done by Gubbins et al ,     14.  Thurmond AS, Harvey WJ, Smith SA. Cesarean section scar
          Fabres et al 24,33  and many others state possible improve-  as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: Diagnosis by sono-
          ment of fertility. All studies that show improvement in   hysterography. J Ultrasound Med 1999 Jan;18(1):13-16.
          fertility following hysteroscopic treatment have a very     15.  Poidevin LO. The value of hysterography in the prediction of
          small sample size.                                      cesarean section wound defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961
                                                                  Jan;81:67-71.
                                                                16.  Morris H. Surgical pathology of the lower uterine segment
          ConCLuSIon                                              caesarean section scar: Is the scar a source of clinical symp-
          A common terminology and definition is needed for       toms? Int J Gynecol Pathol 1995 Jan;14(1):16-20.
          this defect in the myometrium following hysterotomy.     17.  Schepker N, Garcia-Rocha GJ, von Versen-Höynck F, Hil-
                                                                  lemanns P, Schippert C. Clinical diagnosis and therapy of
          We need more RCT in order to assess the best treatment   uterine scar defects after caesarean section in non-pregnant
          options. As opposed to hysteroscopy, in laparoscopy the   women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015 Jun;291(6):1417-1423.
          defect explored, fibrous tissue excised, and the defect in     18.  Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ.
          the myometrium is closed, hence functional and anatomi-  Cesarean scar defect: Correlation between cesarean section
                                         23
          cal aspects of the niche are restored.  Symptoms vanish,   number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position.
                                                                  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009 Jul;34(1):85-89.
          fertility restored, and the potential future problems     19.  Regnard C, Nosbusch M, Fellemans C, Benali N, van Rys-
          negated. Hence, with the available current evidence,    selberghe M, Barlow P, Rozenberg S. Cesarean section scare
          laparoscopy is the way forward to correct the niche.    valuation by saline contrast sonohysterography. Ultrasound
                                                                  Obstet Gynecol 2004 Mar;23(3):289-292.
          REFEREnCES                                            20.  van der Voet LF, Bij de Vaate AM, Veersema S, Brölmann HA,
                                                                  Huirne JA. Long-term complications of caesarean section.
            1.  The Forbes. Which countries have the highest caesarean   The niche in the scar: A prospective cohort study on niche
              section rates? 2016 Jan.                            prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding.
            2.  Roberts CL, Nippita TA. International caesarean section rates:   BJOG 2014 Jan;121(2):236-244.
              The rising tide. Lancet 2015 May;3(5):241-242.    21.  Tower AM, Frishman GN. Cesarean scar defects: An under-
            3.  Clark EA, Silver RM. Long-term maternal morbidity associ-  recognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other
              ated with repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011   gynecologic complications. JMIG 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):562-572.
              Dec;205(6 Suppl):S2-S10.                          22.  Osser Vikhareva O, Valentin L. Risk factors for incomplete
            4.  Silver RM. Delivery after previous cesarean: Long-term   healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section. BJOG
              maternal outcomes. Semin Perinatol 2010 Aug;34(4):258-266.  2010 Aug;117(9):1119-1126.
            5.  Monteagudo A, Carreno C, Timor-Tritsch IE. Saline infusion     23.  Marotta M-L, Donnez J, Squifflet J, Jadoul P, Darii N, Donnez O.
              sonohysterography in nonpregnant women with previous   Laparoscopic repair of post-cesarean section uterine scar
              cesarean delivery: The “niche” in the scar. J Ultrasound Med   defects diagnosed in nonpregnant women. J Minim Invasive
              2001 Oct;20(10):1105-1115.                          Gynecol 2013 Jan;20(3):386-391.
            6.  Masuda H, Uchida H, Maruyama T, Sato K, Sato S, Tanaka M.     24.  Fabres C, Aviles G, De La Jara C, Escalona J, Muñoz JF,
              Successful treatment of atypical cesarean scar defect using   Mackenna A, Fernández C, Zegers-Hochschild F, Fernández
              endoscopic surgery. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:342.  E. The cesarean delivery scar pouch: Clinical implications
            7.  Nezhat C, Grace L, Soliemannjad R, Razavi GM, Nezhat A.   and diagnostic correlation between transvaginal sono-
              Cesarean scar defect: What is it and how should it be treated?   graphy and hysteroscopy. J Ultrasound Med 2003 Jul;22(7):
              OBG Manage 2016 April;28(4):32.                     695-700.
            8.  Vervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJK, Brölmann     25.  Ida A, Kubota Y, Nosaka M, Ito K, Kato H, Tsuji Y. Successful
              HAM, Mol BWJ, Huirne JAF. Why do niches develop in Cae-  management of a cesarean scar defect with dehiscence of the
          120
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21