Page 87 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 87

A Safe Scarless Appendectomy

















            Figs 1A to C: All the needed instruments. (A) The grasper; (B) The tip of the grasper; and (C) The grasper in the telescope with the 10 mm port


















            Figs 2A to C: Extracorporeal steps. (A) Exteriorization of the appendix; (B) Ligation of the mesoappendix; (C) The cecum and the base of the
            appendix had reached skin level

               All patients were asked to empty their bladders before the   During every exploration according to TULAA, the operating
            surgery. Patients were positioned supine with the left arm tucked.   room was prepared for a possible conversion to 3-port classical
            All surgeries were done under general anesthesia. After vigorously   technique.
            cleansing the umbilicus, the umbilicus was pulled out using
            two Allis forceps. A vertical trans-umbilical incision was made.
            Subcutaneous fat and fascia were cut to allow entry and direct   results
            vision into the peritoneal cavity. A sufficient incision allowed the   Fifty-five patients were operated for appendicitis. Fifteen patients
            introduction of the surgeon’s little finger. A single 10 mm umbilical   operated directly according the classical 3-port technique. Forty
            port was introduced. A 10 mm 0-degree operative telescope   patients were initially operated according to TULAA. Median
            with a 6 mm working channel was used (Fig. 1). Patients were   follow-up was 22 (17–27) months. Twenty-five patients were
            positioned in a Trendelenburg position with the table tilted toward   males (male to female ratio: 1.7). The mean age was 10 (3.9–17)
            the patient’s left side. A tracheal aspiration tube connected to a   years. The mean weight was 37 (9–115) kg. The mean duration of
            feeding syringe was inserted in the working channel and used   evolution before the presentation to emergency room was 43
            in order to aspirate the intra-abdominal liquid. A grasper was   (8–120) hours. Mean CRP was 58 (1–107) mg/L. Mean leukocytes
            used in order to bluntly liberate the appendix and the cecum.   count was measured at 15 (6–30) giga/L. Mean polynuclear
            The peritoneal attachments of the cecum and the appendix were   neutrophils count was 11.8 (1.3–27) giga/L. On preoperative
            bluntly divided. When those attachments were judged thick, they   ultrasonography, intra-abdominal effusion was seen in 10
            were coagulated using a monopolar power source connected   patients and appendicolith was seen in 10 patients. Intraoperative
            to the grasper. Minimal liberation was needed. The extent of   diagnosis was early appendicitis in 12 patients, preperforative
            liberation was judged sufficient when, despite the presence of   appendicitis in 14 patients, localized peritonitis in 10 patients,
            the pneumoperitoneum, the appendix’s tip reached the umbilical   and generalized peritonitis in 2 patients. Two patients had interval
            port. The appendix was trapped by its tip and exteriorized along   appendectomy according to TULAA. Conversion to a 3-port
            with the cecum through the umbilical incision after clearing   traditional technique was done in 13 patients. The diagnosis
            the pneumoperitoneum. An extracare must be practiced while   in those was, early appendicitis in 6 patients, preperforative
            exteriorizing a perforated or gangrenous appendix. At skin   appendicitis in 5 patients, and generalized peritonitis in the
            level, the mesoappendix was ligated using a 3-0 multi-filament   remaining 2 patients. The conversion was due to a retrocecal or
            braided woven absorbable suture. The base was ligated using a 0   a subserosal appendicitis with or without a non-mobile-fixed
            multi-filament braided woven absorbable suture. Extracorporeal   cecum in 7 patients. In 2 patients, it was due to generalized
            appendectomy was done (Fig. 2). The stump was then coagulated.   peritonitis. In 1 patient, it was due to short appendiceal vessels.
            Vigorous incisional cleansing was always done before the closure.   In 1 patient, it was related to retroileal appendicitis. In 1 patient,



                                                 World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 15 Issue 3 (September–December 2022)  273
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89