Page 13 - tmp
P. 13

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
                        Table 8: Comparison the complications of various studies
                                                                          Overall complications, N (%)
                         Study        Year   Study design  No. of patients (ELC/DLC)  ELC group  DLC group  p value
                         Kolla et al. 16  2004  Pros/RCT  20/20             4 (20)    3 (15)   0.456
                         Gul et al. 17  2013  Pros/RCT  30/30               6 (20)    4 (12)   0.863
                               8
                         Gutt et al.    2013  Pros RCT  304/314           43 (14.1)  127 (40.4)  <0.001
                         Ozkardes et al. 32  2014  Pros/RCT  30/30          8 (26.7)    0 (0)  0.002
                         Agrawal et al. 35  2015  Pros/RCT  50/50           8 (32)    2 (8)    0.353
                                 31
                         Roulin et al.    2016  Pros/RCT  41/41             6 (14.6)    8 (19.4)  1.000
                         Kohga et al. 25  2018  Retro   288/177           14 (4.8)    23 (12.9)  0.001
                         Chhajed et al. 30  2018  Pros/RCT  30/20           1 (3.3)    5 (25)  0.007
                         Arafa et al. 26  2019  Pros/RCT  74/74           20 (27)     42 (56.7)  <0.001
                         Present study  2019  Pros/RCT  50/50             11 (22)     14 (28)  0.583



            median total length of hospital stay was shorter in ELC group     2.  Norrby S, Herlin P, Holmin T, et al. Early or delayed cholecystectomy
                                                15
                            19
            by 4 days (p <0.001).  Further, Menahem et al.  found that the   in acute cholecystitis? A clinical trial. Br J Surg 1983;70(3):163–165.
            mean total length of hospital stay was 5.4 vs 9.1 days in ELC and   DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800700309.
                                        15
            DLC groups, respectively (p <0.001).  Repeated admission for     3.  Wilson P, Leese T, Morgan WP, et  al. Elective laparoscopic
            recurrent symptoms and a higher rate of conversion have led to   cholecystectomy for “allcomers”. Lancet 1991;338:795–797.
                                                                    DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90674-e.
            more hospital stays. Studies showed that the total hospital stay     4.  Kum CK, Eypasch E, Lefering R, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
                                                        16
            was more in DLC group, except in the studies of Kolla et al.  and   for acute cholecystitis: is it really safe? World J Surg 1996;20(1):43–48.
                     31
            Roulin et al.  (Table 7). We found that the mean total hospital stay   DOI: 10.1007/s002689900008.
            was comparatively less in ELC group as compared to DLC group     5.  Macafee DAL, Humes DJ, Bouliotis G, et al. Prospective randomized
            for acute cholecystitis (p <0.002).                     trial using cost–utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic
               Studies showed that ELC was more economical and resulted in a   cholecystectomy for  acute gallbladder disease.  Br  J  Surg
            better quality of life. 32–34  This may be due to shorter hospitalization   2008;95(Suppl. 3):35. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6685.
            and devoid of conservative treatment in the ELC group. We are     6.  Yamashita Y, Takada T, Hirata K. A survey of the timing and approach
            working in the government-funded hospital; the cost of treatment   to the surgical management of patients with acute cholecystitis in
                                                                    Japanese hospitals. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2006;13(5):409–415.
            was therefore not assessed as it was free.              DOI: 10.1007/s00534-005-1088-7.
               Moreover, meta-analysis of recent randomized studies points      7.  Casillas RA, Yegiyants S, Collins JC. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy
            toward decreased incidence of postoperative wound infection,   is the preferred management of acute cholecystitis. Arch Surg
            shorten total hospital stay, incurred low cost, increased mean   2008;143(6):533–537. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.143.6.533.
            duration of surgery, patient’s satisfaction, quality of life, and     8.  Gutt CN, Encke J, Koninger J, et al. Acute cholecystitis: early versus
            decreased lost working days in the ELC group. Furthermore,   delayed cholecystectomy, a multicentre randomized trial (ACDC
            no differences in bile leakage, bile duct injuries, morbidity, and   study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg 2013;258(3):385–393. DOI: 10.1097/
                                                                    SLA.0b013e3182a1599b.
            conversion to open surgery were reported. 22,23,28    9.  Shaffer EA. Gallstone disease: epidemiology of gallbladder stone
                                                                    disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006;20(6):981–996. DOI:
            conclusIon                                              10.1016/j.bpg.2006.05.004.
            ELC in acute cholecystitis is safe and feasible in comparison to     10.  Banz V, Gsponer T, Candinas D, et al. Population-based analysis of 4113
            elective cholecystectomies. ELC avoids recurrent symptoms due to   patients with acute cholecystitis defining the optimal time-point for
            multiple episodes of acute cholecystitis and is a definite treatment   laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2011;254(6):964–970. DOI:
                                                                    10.1097/SLA.0b013e318228d31c.
            for cholecystitis in failed conservative management Moreover,     11.  Russo MW, Wei JT, Thiny MT, et al. Digestive and liver diseases
            ELC is more advantageous as it provides patients safety and lesser   statistics, 2004. Gastroenterology 2004;126(5):1448–1453. DOI:
            hospital stay. It has economic benefits due to lesser morbidity and   10.1053/j.gastro.2004.01.025.
            mortality.                                           12.  Papi C, Catarci M, D’ambrosio L, et al. Timing of cholecystectomy for
                                                                    acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol
                                                                    2004;99(1):147. DOI: 10.1046/j.1572-0241.2003.04002.x.
            AcknowledgMent                                       13.  Ambe P, Weber SA, Christ H, et al. Cholecystectomy for acute
            Authors gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr Subhajeet Dey, Dir.   cholecystitis. How time-critical are the so called “golden 72 hours”?
            Professor of Surgery, ESI-PGIMSR and Model Hospital, Basaidarapur,   Or better “golden 24 hours” and “silver 25–72 hour”? A case control
            New Delhi, in the revision of this manuscript by doing peer review   study. World J Emerg Surg 2014;9(1):60. DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-60.
            and valuable suggestions.                            14.  Kerwat D, Zargaran A, Bharamgoudar R, et al. Early laparoscopic
                                                                    cholecystectomy is more cost-effective than delayed laparoscopic
                                                                    cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Clinicoecon
            references                                              Outcomes Res 2018;10:119–125. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S149924.
              1.  Järniven HJ, Hästbacka J. Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.     15.  Menahem B, Mulliri A, Fohlen A, et al. Delayed laparoscopic
                A prospective randomized study. Ann Surg 1980;191(4):501–505.   cholecystectomy increases the total hospital stay compared to an
                DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198004000-00018.              early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis: an



                                                 World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 14 Issue 3 (September–December 2021)  155
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18