Page 5 - tmp
P. 5

Intraoperative Cholangiography vs Laparoscopic Ultrasound
            time in LUS compared to IOC (p = 0.001). We carried out a linear   table showed a nonsignificant difference between the two modalities
            regression analysis to see if there was a correlation between LUS   (p = 0.60) (Fig. 3). Similar findings also occurred when evaluating
            and IOC regarding time to complete. We found that there was a   the two modalities for the accuracy in defining extrahepatic biliary
            positive correlation between LUS and IOC for time with Pearson’s   ducts (CBD, common hepatic duct (CHD), and cystic duct). LUS
            correlation coefficient of 0.4225. This correlation was statistically   had a failure rate of 3.77% (2 patients) and a success rate of 96.23%
            significant (p-value <0.0016) (Fig. 1).            (51 patients), while IOC was successful in 100% of cases (50 patients)
               The learning curve was longer for LUS than for IOC. LUS took   in defining extrahepatic ducts. Statistical analysis utilizing a 2 × 2
            a longer time to complete in the first 30 patients and then started   contingency table showed a nonsignificant difference between the
            to decline with Pearson’s correlation coefficient of −0.8717 and   two modalities (p-value = 0.88) (Fig. 4).
            p-value <0.0001 using linear regression analysis. IOC had a less
            steep learning curve with time to complete dropping by 20 patients
            and Pearson’s correlation coefficient = −0.4788 and p-value <0.0003
            using linear regression analysis (Fig. 2).
            Accuracy of LUS and IOC in Defining Biliary Tract
            Structures
            IOC had an accuracy rate of 100% (50 patients) in defining biliary ducts
            at the porta hepatis compared to 84.91% (45 patients) for LUS with a
            failure rate of 15.09%. Statistical analysis utilizing a 2x2 contingency



                                                               Fig. 3: A 2 × 2 contingency table for accuracy analysis between LUS and
                                                                                               2
                                                               IOC in defining bile ducts at porta hepatis. X Fisher-exact one-tailed
                                                               p-value = 0.60

















                                                               Fig. 4: A 2 × 2 contingency table for accuracy analysis between LUS
                                                                                               2
            Fig. 1: Correlation between LUS time and IOC time. Pearson’s correlation   and IOC in defining extrahepatic bile ducts. X Fisher-exact one-tailed
            coefficient = 0.4225. p-value <0.0016 using linear regression analysis  p-value = 0.88
























            Figs 2A and B: (A) LUS learning curve by time in minutes. Pearson’s correlation coefficient = −0.8717. p-value <0.0001 using linear regression analysis;
            (B) IOC learning curve by time in minutes. Pearson’s correlation coefficient = −0.4788. p-value <0.0003 using linear regression analysis

                                                        World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 14 Issue 2 (May–August 2021)  71
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10