Page 4 - tmp
P. 4

Intraoperative Cholangiography vs Laparoscopic Ultrasound

            MAterIAls And Methods                              distal CBD was identified by injecting another 5 cc of contrast.
            Study Population                                   The fluoroscopy arm was shifted cephalad, and another 5 cc of
                                                               contrast is injected to visualize the common hepatic duct and the
            This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Surgery Department   proximal hepatic radicals. When the cholangiogram was done, the
            of Suez Canal University Hospital, Ismailia, Egypt. It was performed   clamp and catheter were removed and two clips were placed just
            on patients who were presented to the surgery outpatient clinic and   distal to the ductotomy.
            were scheduled for elective LC for symptomatic cholelithiasis. This
            study included patients who were scheduled for LC for symptomatic  Statistical Analysis
            cholelithiasis and were stratified as low-risk of having CBD stones.  The formula for the sample size was as follows:  n  (per
            The patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were allocated to   test) = [α/2 + β/2]  * [(p  * (1 − p )) + (p  * (1 − p ))]/[p  − p ]
                                                                                                                2
                                                                              2
                                                                                                               2
                                                                                  1
                                                                                          1
                                                                                                           1
                                                                                                      2
                                                                                               2
            a sampling frame and randomized by simple random sampling.   where n = the sample size required in each group, p  = sensitivity
                                                                                                      1
            Ethical approval was obtained from the Surgery Department at   of LUS in choledocholithiasis = 96%, p  = sensitivity of IOC in
                                                                                              2
            Suez Canal University Hospital. Patients were notified about the   choledocholithiasis = 75%, α depends on desired significance
            study, and the informed written consent was obtained prior to   level (95%) = 1.96, and β depends on desired power (90%) = 1.28.
            participation in the study.                        Thus, the sample included 53 patients who fulfilled the inclusion
               We included patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis between   criteria. A data entry form was created using Epi Info 7.0, and
            the ages of 18 years (for easy laparoscopic instrumentation   the same software was utilized for statistical analysis along
            with LUS 10-mm probe) and 65  years (more comorbidities   with the SPSS 16 for advanced statistics. Continuous data were
            as a relative contraindication to LC). We excluded patients   expressed as mean and stander deviation, and categorical data
            with contraindications to LC, complicated cholelithiasis   were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Continuous
            (e.g. obstructive jaundice and acute pancreatitis), previous   data with normal distribution were compared using the
            gastrointestinal surgery, contrast hypersensitivity, previous   Student’s t-test or ANOVA, while the Mann–Whitney/Wilcoxon
            endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and   two-sample test was used to compare two-sample variables
            CBD stent due to radiological falsies, or conversion to open   with other distributions. The accuracy indexes of LUS and IOC
            cholecystectomy during LC.                         were expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive
                                                               value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic
            Data Collection                                    odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval. The significance
            All enrolled patients were subjected to history taking for   level was considered at 0.05×.
            exclusion criteria and comorbidities, clinical examination for
            signs of cholelithiasis, laboratory investigations (liver functions   results
            and coagulation profile), and a recent transabdominal US
            examination that includes sizes of the gallbladder and CBD, wall   Baseline Data
            thickness, presence of stones, masses, polyps, or fluid around   Our study enrolled 53 patients: 17 males and 3 females. The
            the gallbladder, as well as the status of the pancreatic head.   mean ages for male and female groups were 41.35 ±  8.48
            Patients then underwent intraoperative LUS before dissection   and 40.06 ± 11.85 years, respectively (age was statistically
            of Calot’s triangle and IOC video fluoroscopy examination of the   comparable between both genders; p = 0.69). Of the patients,
            extrahepatic biliary tree.                         22 (41.5%) had multiple stones and 31 (58.5%) had solitary stones
                                                               on preoperative US.
            Laparoscopic Ultrasound
            We introduced the deflectable multifrequency (7.5–10 MHz)   Intra- and Postoperative Complication Rates
            endosonography linear probe through a 10-mm port, while the   No intraoperative complications occurred in all enrolled
            camera was placed through the midepigastric port. First, the liver   patients. In terms of 30 days’ follow-up, only nine (17%) had
            was scanned and the CBD was identified. The gallbladder and liver   postoperative complications that included chest infections (three),
            were retracted superiorly and cephalad. Sometimes the junction   intraabdominal collection (two), urinary tract infection (one), and
            of the right and left hepatic ducts could be seen. The CBD was   wound infections (three). No mortalities were recorded during
            followed to the duodenum. A transverse view of the bile duct   the follow-up period.
            could be obtained by acute deflection of the transducer.
                                                               LUS vs IOC Success Rates
            Intraoperative Cholangiography                     LUS was successful in all 53 (100%) cases, while IOC was successful
            We initially dissected the Calot’s triangle to identify the cystic   in 50 (94.3%) cases. Using the Chi-square test to compare the
            duct and artery, which was divided between clips. To apply the   success rate between LUS and IOC, we observed no significant
            cholangiocatheter, we dissected the cystic duct free for about   difference between both tests (OR = 1.0061; p = 0.08). The reasons
            3 cm and then applied a ligature on the junction of the GB and   for the three observed failures in IOC included narrow cystic duct,
            the cystic duct. The cholangiocatheter was introduced through   thick valves at cystic duct, and technical failure.
            the midclavicular port or through a separate puncture in the right
            upper quadrant. Utilizing dynamic fluoroscopy, we obtained a   Time to Complete the Procedure
            scout film to localize the tip of the cholangiocatheter. First, only   In terms of the time to complete the procedure, LUS took
            2 to 3 cc of a water-soluble contrast dye with 25% concentration   12.53 ± 2.56 minutes to complete with a range of 6 to 17 minutes,
            (diatrizoic acid: Gastrografin and sometimes Omnipaque) were   while IOC took 8.66 ± 2.77 minutes to complete with a range
            injected identifying the cystic duct–CBD junction. The fluoroscopy   of 7 to 15  minutes. Comparing both procedures using the
            unit was shifted caudally a few centimeters, and the course of the   Mann–Whitney/Wilcoxon Test showed a significantly longer


             70   World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 14 Issue 2 (May–August 2021)
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9