Page 36 - tmp
P. 36
Comparative Evaluation of Vaginoscopy vs Traditional Hysteroscopy
17. De Silva PM, Carnegy A, Smith PP, et al. Vaginoscopy for office 19. Smith PP, Kolhe S, O’Connor S, et al. Vaginoscopy against standard
hysteroscopy: a systematic review and metanalysis. Eur J treatment: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2019;126(7):891–899.
Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020;252:278–285. DOI: 10.1016/ DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15665. PMID: 30801889.
j.ejogrb.2020.06.045. PMID: 32645643. 20. Tahir MM, Bigrigg MA, Browning JJ, et al. A randomised controlled
18. [Diagnostic possibilities of the flexible hysteroscopy in irregular trial comparing transvaginal ultrasound, outpatient hysteroscopy
uterine bleeding]. Zlatkov V, Bŭrzakov G, Cholakova A, Miloshov V, and endometrial biopsy with inpatient hysteroscopy and curettage.
Radeva V, Velinov E, Mikhova A Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia, 01 Jan Br J Obstret Gynecol 1999;106(12):1259–1264. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-
2006, 45(1):36-40. 0528.1999.tb08179.x.
102 World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 14 Issue 2 (May–August 2021)
