Page 55 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 55

Laparoscopy: A See- and -treat Modality for LAP in Females
            Table 4: Final diagnosis after laparoscopy         Table 6: Therapeutic laparoscopy
            Laparoscopic diagnosis          Number  Percentage  Laparoscopic treatment        Number  Percentage
            Pelvic inflammatory disease     17       20.2       Adhesiolysis                  35      41.7
            Endometriosis                   15       17.9       Cystectomy                    15      17.9
            Ectopic pregnancy               13       15.5       Fulguration of endometriotic plaques  15  17.9
            Ovarian cyst                    13       15.5       Cystotomy                      8       9.5
            Genital TB                       6        7.1       Salpingectomy                  8       9.5
            Diagnostic dilemma               5        5.9       Salpingostomy                  5       5.9
            Only adhesions                   5        5.9       Ovarian drilling               4       4.8
            Polycystic ovarian disease       4        4.8       Myomectomy                     3       3.6
            Fibroid                          2        2.4       Intrauterine contraceptive device   2  2.4
            Misplaced intrauterine contraceptive   2  2.4       removed from peritoneal cavity
            device with uterine perforation                     Salpingo-oophrectomy           1       1.2
            Uterus didelphys with obstructed   1      1.2
            hemivagina                                         followed by other procedures given in Table 6. In 8.3% (n = 7) cases,
            Pelvic abscess                   1        1.2      the laparoscopy was converted into laparotomy and treatment
            Total                           84      100        was provided in the same sitting. No major intraoperative,
                                                               postoperative, or anesthetic complications were encountered.
            Table 5: Correlation between provisional and laparoscopic diagnosis
            of lower abdominal pain                            dIscussIon
                                       Laparoscopic diagnosis
                                 Diagnosed  Undiagnosed   Total   Lower abdominal pain represents a significant problem in female
                                                               patients. It is a common problem faced not only by the gynecologists
            Provisional   Diagnosed  62    1           63      but by all practicing physicians. For the correct diagnosis of lower
            diagnosis                                          abdominal pathology, even a battery of investigations may not
                       Undiag-   17        4           21      reveal exact cause of pain. In the present study, on the basis of
                       nosed                                   history, examination, and ultrasound a provisional diagnosis could
                       Total     79        5           84      be reached only in 75% (n = 63) of the cases and rest of the 25%
                                                               (n = 21) cases did not revealed any abnormality, which is similar
            abdominal surgery without any gynecological problem were found   to the study conducted by Morino et al., who diagnosed 73.4% of
            in 5.9% (n = 5) of cases. Myoma was found in 2.4% (n = 2) of cases.   patients on the basis of basic investigations and abdominal USG. 6
            There were two (2.4%) cases of misplaced intrauterine contraceptive   Although laparoscopy is an invasive modality, it allows the
            device (IUCD) where the IUCDs were found in the Pouch of Douglas   surgeon to survey the entire abdomen through a small puncture,
            (POD). One patient (1.2%) was diagnosed as the didelphys uterus   better than any other investigative modalities. It can be considered
            with obstructed hemivagina with hematometra, hematocolpos,   as the first-line interventional investigation for LAP. In the present
            and hematosalpinx. There was one (1.2%) case of pelvic abscess   study after laparoscopy, pathology was found in 94.1% (n = 79) of
            where thick pus with adhesion was present.         cases and no abnormality was noted in remaining 5.9% (n = 5) of
               Correlation was done between the provisional diagnosis, made   patients. Thus, laparoscopy increases the chances of diagnosing the
            on the basis of clinical examination and abdominal ultrasound, with   cause of LAP. This shows that laparoscopy is a very good diagnostic
            the final diagnosis made after laparoscopy and histopathology   tool for the LAP. Our finding is quite similar to Arya and Gaur, Bareeq
            (Table 5). There were 73.8% (n = 62) cases where the cause of LAP   and Dayna, Ali et al., and Baria, who also reported pathology on
            was diagnosed both by clinical examination with USG and by   laparoscopy in 90, 98, 93.3 and 90% of cases, respectively. 7–10
            laparoscopy. In 20.2% (n = 17) of cases, no abnormality was detected   Moussa et al., Kang et al., and Morino also found abnormality in
            on clinical examination and USG; diagnosis was in dilemma. Only   nearly same frequency, 78.6, 79.2, and 80%, respectively. 6,11,12
            after laparoscopy, the cause of LAP was established. There were   Besides diagnosis, laparoscopy can also help in the management
            7.1% (n = 6) cases of genital TB, 5.9% (n = 5) cases of endometriosis,   of both acute, subacute, and chronic LAP. Therapeutic intervention
            5.9% (n = 5) cases of intra-abdominal adhesions, and 1.2% (n = 1)   like adhesiolysis, fulguration of endometriotic lesions, cystectomy,
            cases of PID. There was one case (1.2%) of chronic cervicitis where no   and salpingectomy can be done at the same sitting, thus avoiding
            abnormality was found on either laparoscopy or ultrasound. It was   unnecessary laparotomy. Therefore, it can be considered as a “see
            found on clinical examination. No abnormality was detected in 4.8%   and treat” modality. In the present study, therapeutic laparoscopy
            (n = 4) cases either on clinical examination, USG, or laparoscopy. On   was performed in 82.1% of woman. Moussa, Arya and Gaur, Bareeq
            applying the McNemar’s test, the p value was less than 0.05, which   and Dayna, Baria, and Kumar et al. also have performed therapeutic
            shows laparoscopy is statistically significant for the diagnosis of   laparoscopy in the same sitting in 64.3, 75.5, 78, 90, and 69%
            LAP. So, when history, examination, noninvasive investigations,   patients, respectively. 7,8,10,12,13
            and laparoscopy are combined the diagnosis rate is increased. Not   Sometimes, though no abnormality is detected on laparoscopy,
            only that, the patients are treated in the same sitting when the   it helps in giving reassurance to the patients and removes the
            pathology was noted.                               psychological concern, which is associated with chronic pelvic pain.
               Diagnostic as well as therapeutic laparoscopy was performed in   If laparoscopic exploration is not sufficient, the surgeon should
            82.1% (n = 69) of women. Adhesiolysis was done in 41.7% (n = 35),   not hesitate to convert into laparotomy. In the present study, 8.3%


                                                       World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 13 Issue 1 (January–April 2020)  53
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56