Page 5 - WJOLS - Laparoscopic Journal

WJOLS

Comparison of Open and Closed Entry Techniques for Creation of Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Surgery
Table 3: Complications in two groups REFERENCES
Variable Group A (100) Group B (100) 1. Fuller J, Scott W, Ashar B, Corrado J. Laparoscopic trocar
Failure of technique 0 3 (3%) injuries: a report from US FDA center for devices and radio-
Air leakage 5 (5%) 0 logical health. Systematic Technology Assessment of Medical
Port site infection 2 (2%) 0 Products Committee 2005;25:1-14.
Port site hernia 0 1 (1%) 2. Kovachev S, Ganovska A, Atanasova V, Sergeev S, Mutafchiyski V,
Injuries (including 0 2 (2%) Vladov N. Open laparoscopy: a modified Hasson technique.
preperitoneal insufflation) Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) 2015;54(4):52-56.
p value < 0.05 3. Dunne N, Booth MI, Dehn TC. Establishing pneumoperi-
toneum: verres or hasson? The debate continues. Ann R Coll
(TAPP and TEP). One of the key steps in this type of Surg Engl 2011 Jan;93(1):22-24.
surgery is induction of pneumoperitonium, which is 4. Ballem RV, Rudomanski J. Techniques of pneumoperitoneum.
Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993;3(1):42-43.
not physiological and has adverse hemodynamic and 5. Hurd WW, Randolph JF Jr, Holmberg RA, Pearl ML, Hubbell GP.
7,8
respiratory outcomes. These effects can be minimized Open laparoscopy without special instruments or sutures. Com-
with appropriate dedicated anesthetic management. 14-16 parison with a closed technique. J Reprod Med 1994;39(5):393-397.
Iatrogenic injuries in laparoscopic surgery, however, are 6. Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, Santoro E. Major and minor
still a problem confronted by the surgeon. 15,16 Traditional injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum: a multi-
center study on 12,919 cases. Surg Endosc 2001;15(6):566-567.
closed method of pneumoperitonium involves initial 7. Schulze S, Lyng KM, Bugge K, Perner A, Bendtsen A, Thorup J,
blind entry into abdomen and more than half of such et al. Cardiovascular and respiratory changes and convales-
injuries are related to this primary blind access and cence in laparoscopic colonic surgery comparison between
9
occur before the start of actual anatomic dissection. It is carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and gasless laparoscopy.
Arch Surg 1999;134(10):1112-1118.
because of these complications that laparoscopic surgery 8. Safran DM, Orlando R. Physiologic effects of pneumo-
faced a lot of criticism by the surgical community in peritoneum. Am J Surg 1994;167(2):281-286.
10
the beginning. To prevent these complications other 9. Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimpos T, Herman J. Complication
methods were introduced in practice like open tech- of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre study. Br J Obstet
nique as devised by Harrith Hasson, direct trocar Gynaecol 1997;104(5):595-600.
inser tion, optical trocars, radically expending trocars 10. Yuzpe AA. Pneumoperitoneum needle and trocar injuries in
laparoscopy: a survey on possible contributing factors and
and use of disposable shielded trocars. 11-14 However, the prevention. J Reprod Med 1990;35(5):485-490.
veress needle technique and Hasson’s technique with 11. Molly D, Kalloo PD, Cooper M. Laparoscopy entry: a literature
their different modifications are the two widely used review and analysis of techniques and complications of pri-
15
methods today. We compared these methods in terms mary port entry. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;14(3):365-374.
12. Yerdel MA, Karayalcin K, Koyuncu A, Akin B, Koksoy C,
of time required to induce pneumoperitonium, time Turkcapar AG, et al. Direct trocar insertion versus veress
needed to close the wounds, total operating time and needle insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg
complications associated with each method in our stu- 1999 Mar;177(3):247-249.
dies if failure of technique was more seen in case of closed 13. Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Labergy PY. Lapa-
technique then on other hand port site infection, and roscopic entery; a review of techniques, technologies and
complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007;29(5):433-465.
air leakage was more a problem with open technique. 14. Ahmad G, Daffy JM, Philips K, Watson A. Laparoscopic entry
techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;16(2):CD006583
CONCLUSION 15. Vilos GA, Vilos AG. Safe laparoscopic entry guided by
Veress needle CO -insufflation pressure. J Am Assoc Gynae-
2
From this study we can reach to a conclusion that there col Laparosc 2003;10(3):415-420.
is no evidence to support the superiority of one tech- 16. Singal R, Singal RP, Sandhu K, Singh B, Bhatia G, Khatri A,
nique over the other, and this view is supported by Sharma BP. Evaluation and comparison of postoperative
the literature. We believe that surgeons should be com- levels of serum bilirubin, serum transaminases and alkaline
phosphatase in laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open
petent in both techniques. Either can be used without chole cystectomy. J Gastrointest Oncol 2015;6(5):479-486.
undue risk. Available at: http://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.058

World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, September-December 2015;8(3):69-71 71