Page 24 - WJOLS - Laparoscopic Journal
P. 24

WJOLS



          Inamull Hasan SA Shaikh                                               10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1255
          REVIEW ARTICLE


          Surgical Approaches for Rectal Prolapse and

          their Comparative Study

          Inamull Hasan SA Shaikh


          ABSTRACT                                               The etiology is unclear. Rectal prolapse is often asso-
          Rectal prolapse is a distressing condition often affecting elderly   ciated with obesity, pregnancy, chronic constipation and
          patients. Open rectopexy has a proven track record in the treat-  other conditions that lead to increased abdominal pressure.
          ment of this condition but may be complicated by significant   The most common anatomic varieties in patients with
          morbidity. The benign nature of the disease and reduced pain and   rectal prolapse are redundant sigmoid, diastases of the
          pulmonary complications of the laparoscopic approach makes   elevator ani, loss of the vertical position of the rectum and
          this an attractive operation in this patient group. Laparoscopic                           1,2
          prosthesis fixation rectopexy and lateral ligament suspension   its sacral attachments and a deep cul-de-sac.  A rectal
                                                                                                             3,4
          with and without colectomy have been described with low recur-  prolapse  I° is seen in 20 to 50% of healthy individuals.
          rence rates, good patient acceptability, symptom improvement,
          on both radiological and physiological assessments. Currently,  OPERATION PROCEDURES
          the laparoscopic approach with ventral mesh rectopexy or resec-
          tion rectopexy is the two most commonly used techniques. As   Multiple operations have been described for the rectal
          high quality evidence is missing, an individualized approach is   prolapse. In the following section, techniques and results
          recommend for every patient considering age, individual health  of operations as far as they are performed laparoscopi-
          status and the underlying morphological and functional disorders.  cally are explained and rated (Table 1).
          Keywords: Laparoscopy, Mesh rectopexy, Rectal prolapse,     The aim of the operation generally is to correct the
          Resection rectopexy, Suture rectopexy.              morphologic alteration, and thereby treat the symptoms
          How to cite this article: Shaikh IHSA. Surgical Approaches  of the patient, e.g. improve incontinence or constipation
          for Rectal Prolapse and their Comparative Study. World J Lap   and incomplete emptying, depending on what major
          Surg 2015;8(3):90-95.
                                                              symptoms the patient is suffering from. This can be
          Source of support: Nil                              achieved by three ways:
          Conflict of interest: None                          1.  Fixation of the rectum (rectopexy);
                                                              2.  Resection or plication of redundant bowel; and
          INTRODUCTION                                        3.  Mobilization of the rectum. Most operations com-
                                                                 bine the two principles of rectal mobilization and
          Complete rectal prolapse is defined as protrusion of all   rectopexy, some operations add bowel resection.
          layers of the rectum through the anal canal, full thick-  The approach can be trans anal/perineal or transabdo-
          ness rectal prolapse (FRP). A protrusion of mucosa only   minal. Abdominal operations seem to result in lower
          is called mucosa prolapse (MP).                     recurrence rates but there are no randomized controlled
             A common classification divides three grades as   trials substantiating this.  Perineal procedures avoid
                                                                                    5,6
          follows:                                            laparotomy/laparoscopy, and therefore, may have a lower
          1.  Rectal prolapse  I°: Inner (recto-rectal) intussusception   operative risk and morbidity. They may, therefore, be
             of the rectum proximal of the anal canal;        more suitable for older or high-risk patients with a rele-
          2.  Rectal prolapse II°: Inner (recto-anal) intussusception   vant co-morbidity, although again there are no adequately
             into the anal canal;                             powered RCTs to back these recommendations up.
          3.  Rectal prolapse III°: Prolapse of the rectum beyond the   Virtually all abdominal procedures that were originally
             anus (external prolapse).
                                                              described via laparotomy can also be performed laparos-
                                                              copically. The laparoscopic surgery of rectal prolapse
                                                              was first introduced in 1992 and consisted of a suture-
            Private Practitioner
            Department of General Surgery, Shaikh Polyclinic and Imad   less rectopexy with staples without bowel resection. In the
            Nursing Home, Raigad, Maharashtra, India          meantime, besides the conventional laparoscopic approach,
            Corresponding Author: Inamull Hasan SA Shaikh, Private   there are new reports of a robotic-assisted approach with
                                                                                7,8
            Practitioner, Department of Surgery, Shaikh Polyclinic and Imad   the da Vinci system.  The transabdominal operations
            Nursing Home, Mahad, Raigad, Maharashtra, India, Phone:   differ mainly in the extent of rectal mobilization, the method
            09970564719, e-mail: surgeongroup@gmail.com
                                                              of rectal fixation and the additional sigmoid resection.
          90
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29