Page 6 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 6

Mohamed Abdelmohsen, Hazem Badr
                                  Table 10: The BMI (minimum, maximum, mean ± SD, and percentile)
                                                                                          Percentile
                              Minimum      Maximum       Mean       SD       25th        Median (50th)    75th
           BMI 1 day pre      39.8         56.1          48.4       3.5      45.0        49.4             50.7
           BMI 3 months       34           43.5          39.2       2.6      37.0        39.8             41.0
           BMI 6 months       30.2         39.1          34.9       2.3      32.6        35.8             36.3
           BMI 9 months       27           37.2          32.1       2.3      30.2        32.0             34.0
           BMI 12 months      25           35.8          30.2       2.3      29.0        30.0             32.3
           SD: Standard deviation

                    Table 11: Improvement of BMI by time      often lead to multiple nutritional consequences due to
           BMI          Mean ± SD       Step p-value     p-value  the bypass of duodenum and Jejunum. 16
           1 day pre    48.4 ± 3.5     …            <0.001       Several studies done on effect of LSG on amelio-
                                                                                                17
           3 months     39.2 ± 2.6   <0.001           HS      ration of T2DM, in 2011, Nosso et al  with 25 obese
           6 months     34.9 ± 2.3   <0.001                   T2DM patients with a mean age (45 ± 9 years) and in
           9 months     32.1 ± 2.3   <0.001                   2010, Rizzello et al  with 17 obese T2DM patients with
                                                                              18
           12 months    30.2 ± 2.3   <0.001                   a mean age 51.1 ± 8.6 years (38–64) were submitted to
           SD: Standard deviation; HS: Highly significant
                                                              LSG. While in our study the number of subjects was 40,
                                                              patients with a mean age of 38.8 ± 7 years (25–50) were
             Preoperatively, the mean BMI was (48.4 ± 3.5) (39.8–  submitted to LSG.
                                                                                    2
                    2
          56.1) kg/m  and postoperative values were (39.2 ± 2.6)   In 2009, Rosenthal et al  had 30 obese patients, 21 (70%)
                                                                                                             17
          (34–43.5) kg/m , (34.9 ± 2.3) (30.2–39.1) kg/m , (32.1 ± 2.3)  were women and 9 (30%) were men, and in Nosso et al
                       2
                                                 2
          (27–37.2) kg/m , and (30.2 ± 2.3) (25–35.8) kg/m  at 3, 6,  had 25 (obese T2DM) patients, of which 15 (60%) were
                       2
                                                    2
          9, and 12 months respectively, as in Table 10.      women and 10 (40%) were men and all were submitted
             Postoperative improvement of BMI occurred with a  to LSG. While in our study the number of patients were
          significant declining (weight loss) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months  40, 31 (77.5%) were women and 9 (22.5%) were men and
                                                                                                  14
          (p < 0.001) as in Table 11.                         were submitted to LSG. In 2008, Vidal et al  had 39 (obese
                                                              T2DM) patients with a mean BMI (51.9 ± 1.2) submitted to
          DISCUSSION                                          LSG and had 52 (obese T2DM) patients with a mean BMI
                                                              (47.7 ± 0.7) submitted to GBP. At 12 months after surgery
          The risk of developing DM increases with the severity   the % estimated weight loss (EWL) was (63 ± 2.89%) (66.06
          and duration of obesity and a central distribution of body   ± 2.34%); p = 0.413 respectively, and in 2011, Nosso et
             8
          fat.  Currently, bariatric surgery is the only interventional   al  had 25 (obese T2DM) subjects with a mean BMI was
                                                               17
          method proved to induce significant long-term weight   (48.8 kg/m ) and were submitted to LSG. The mean BMI
                                                                       2
                   9
          reduction.  Studies have demonstrated that Roux-en-Y   decreased to (39 ± 8 kg/m ) (p < 0.001) and (34 ± 6 kg/m )
                                                                                    2
                                                                                                             2
                        10
                                                     11
          gastric bypass,  vertical banded gastroplasty,  and   (p < 0.001) at 3 months and (9–15) months after surgery
                                              12
          laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding  can result in   respectively. While in a comparison with our study, the
          significant clinical improvement in DM after weight   mean of the BMI was (48.4 ± 3.5 kg/m ) at the baseline
                                                                                                2
          loss. Other studies have compared the different types   and decreased to (39.2 ± 2.6 kg/m ) at 3 months and (30.2
                                                                                           2
          of bariatric surgery options and their efficiencies in the   ± 2.3 kg/m ) at 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.001), and
                                                                       2
                                           13
          management of obesity-related T2DM.  Limited data are   the % EWL was (36.5 + 3.1%) and (65.6 ± 3.1%) respec-
          available evaluating the effect of SG on the control of DM.  tively. Serum insulin levels showed a sharp and signifi-
          Some studies have even suggested that SG is as effective  cant reduction at postoperative 1 day (13.5 ± 2.2 uU/mL)
          as gastric bypass in inducing remission of T2DM and the  (p < 0.001) and at 3 months (4.4 ± 1.8 uU/mL) (p < 0.001),
          metabolic syndrome (MS). 14                         but a nonsignificant changes occurred at 6 months
             Recent studies have shown that LSG is associated  (5.3 ± 1.5 uU/mL) (p = 0.51), 9 months (5.2 ± 1.3 uU/mL)
          with a marked reduction of ghrelin secretion, which is  (p = 1), and 12 months (4.8 ± 1 uU/mL) (p = 0.85). The
          produced by the gastric fundus involved in meal time  improvement in insulin sensitivity is primarily due to
          hunger regulation and it is also known to extend several  weight loss, reduction in inflammatory mediators, and
          diabetogenic effects (increase in growth hormone, cor-  decreased calorie intake, although the contribution of
          tisol, and epinephrine); therefore, its suppression could  weight independent mechanisms seems very likely, rapid
                                          15
          contribute to improved homeostasis.  The LSG is a safe  improvement of glucose hemostasis before substantial
                                                                                      19
          procedure in terms of nutritional status at odds with  weight loss has occurred.  Our study showed that
          malabsorptive or mixed surgical procedures, which  the PPBG levels had a significant declining at 1 day
          48
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11