Page 50 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgeons

Maulana M Ansari
CONCLUSION 11. Rosen, MJ.; Petro, CC.; Stringer, MD. Anterior abdominal
wall. In: Standring S, editors. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical
The PRS varies markedly in its extent and morphology. basis of clinical practice. 41st ed. Chapter 61. UK: Elsevier;
The present study documented the occurrence of the 2016. pp. 1069-1082.
classically described PRS in only 46% of the laparo- 12. Loukas M, Myers C, Shah R, Tubbs RS, Wartmann C, Apaydin N,
scopic TEPP hernia repairs, while in the remaining Betancor J, Jordan R. Arcuate line of the rectus sheath: clinical
54% of the cases, the PRS was found variant in extent approach. Anat Sci Int 2008 Sep;83(3):140-144.
and/or morphology. Variant PRS included SWT (4.4%), 13. Ansari MM. Arcuate Line Variations: are they important for
TEP surgeons? Kuwait Med J 2015 Dec;47(4):313-316.
LWT (4.4%), CWT (8.8%), NPT (11.8%), LPT (10.3%), 14. Deurenberg P, Weststrate JA, Seidell JC. Body mass index as a
NTO (1.5%), CTO (4.4%), NGA (1.5%), CGA (4.4%), CPT measure of fatness: age- and sex-specific prediction formulas.
(1.5%), and CMT (1.5%). Moreover, the PRS anatomy did Br J Nutr 1991 Mar;65(2):105-114.
not have mirror image on the two sides of the body in 15. Walmsley R. The sheath of the rectus abdominis. J Anat 1937
75% of the bilateral hernias. Early conversion second- Apr;71(Pt 3):404-414.
ary to unforeseen anatomic variation was seen in 1.6%, 16. McVay CB, Anson BJ. Composition of the rectus sheath. Anat
Rec 1940 Jun;77(2):213-225.
but there was no conversion secondary to the so-called 17. Anson BJ, Morgan EH, McVay CB. Surgical anatomy of the
difficult dissection. There was no recurrence of hernia. inguinal region based upon a study of 500 body halves. Surg
Gynecol Obstet 1960 Dec;111:707-725.
CLINICAL SIgNIfICANCE 18. McVay CB. The anatomic basis for inguinal and femoral
hernioplasty. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974 Dec;139(6):931-945.
Truly new visions of the structures known for centuries are 19. Williams, PL.; Bannister, L.; Berry, M.; Collins, P.; Dyson, M.;
realized under excellent perspective and magnification of Dusse, J.; Fergusson, M.; editors. Gray’s anatomy. 38th ed.
7
laparoscopy, and therefore, continued research in the lapa- London: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. pp. 551-559.
roscopic live surgical anatomy cannot be overemphasized 20. Sinnatamby, C.; editor. Last’s anatomy. 10th ed. Edinburg:
in the current era of the newer laparoscopic approaches as Churchill-Livingstone; 2000. pp. 218-219.
1
had been rightly recommended by Arregui and Avisse 21. Flament, JB.; Avisse, C.; Delattre, JF. Anatomy of the abdominal
wall. In: Bendavid R, Abrahamson J, Arregui ME, Flament JB,
7
et al. The requirement for a crisp, precise knowledge of Phillips EE, editors. Abdominal wall hernias: principles and
preperitoneal anatomy and the timely identification of management. Chapter 8. New York: Spinger-Verlag; 2001.
its variations for performing the seamless laparoscopic pp. 39-63.
hernia repair with better outcomes cannot be overem- 22. Spitz JD, Arregui ME. Sutureless laparoscopic extraperitoneal
phasized, 1,25,30 as is also evident from the present study. inguinal herniorrhaphy using reusable instruments: two
hundred three repairs without recurrence. Surg Laparosc
REfERENCES Endosc Percutan Tech 2000 Feb;10(1):24-29.
23. Cunningham SC, Rosson GD, Lee RH, Williams JZ, Lustman CA,
1. Arregui ME. Surgical anatomy of the pre-peritoneal fasciae Slezak S, Goldberg NH, Silverman RP. Localization of the
and posterior transversalis fasciae in the inguinal region. arcuate line from surface anatomic landmarks: a cadaveric
Hernia 1997 Jul;1(2):101-110. study. Ann Plast Surg 2004 Aug;53(2):129-131.
2. Rizk NN. A new description of the anterior abdominal wall 24. Colborn GL, Skandalakis JE. Laparoscopic inguinal anatomy.
in man and mammals. J Anat 1980 Oct;131(Pt 3):373-385. Hernia 1998 Dec;2(4):179-191.
3. Monkhouse WS, Khalique A. Variations in the composition of 25. Faure JP, Doucet C, Rigourd PH, Richer JP, Scepi M. Ana-
the human rectus sheath: a study of the anterior abdominal tomical pitfalls in the technique for total extra peritoneal
wall. J Anat 1986 Apr;145:61-66. laparoscopic repair for inguinal hernias. Surg Radiol Anat
4. Rizk NN. The arcuate line of the rectus sheath–does it exist? 2006 Oct;28(5):486-493.
J Anat 1991 Apr;175:1-6. 26. Choi YY, Kim Z, Hur KY. The safety and effectiveness of
5. Mwachaka P, Odula P, Awori K, Kaisha W. Variations in the laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair for recurrent
pattern of formation of the abdominis rectus muscle sheath inguinal hernia after open hernioplasty. J Laparoendosc Adv
among Kenyans. Int J Morphol 2009;27(4):1025-1029. Surg Tech 2010 Jul-Aug;20(6):537-539.
6. Mwachaka PM, Saidi HS, Odula PO, Awori KO, Kaisha 27. Scheuerlein H, Schiller A, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Tamme C,
WO. Locating the arcuate line of Douglas: is it of surgical Kockerling F. Totally extraperitoneal repair of recurrent
relevance. Clin Anat 2010 Jan;23(1):84-86. inguinal hernia: results from 179 consecutive patients. Surg
7. Avisse C, Delattre JF, Flament JB. The inguinofemoral area Endosc 2003 Jul;17(7):1072-1076.
from a laparoscopic standpoint. History, anatomy, and surgi- 28. Lau H. Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal her-
cal applications. Surg Clin North Am 2000 Feb;80(1):35-48. nioplasty for recurrence after open repair. ANZ J Surg 2004
8. Ansari MM. Complete posterior rectus sheath and total extra- Oct;74(10):877-880.
peritoneal hernioplasty. Saudi Surg J 2014 Dec;2(3):80-83. 29. Garg P, Menon GR, Rajagopal M, Ismail M. Laparoscopic
9. Ansari MM. Effective rectus sheath canal: does it affect TEP total extraperitoneal repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.
approach for inguinal mesh hernioplasty. J Exp Integr Med Surg Endosc 2010 Feb;24(2):450-454.
2013 Jan;3(1):73-76. 30. Marks SC Jr, Gilroy AM, Page DW. The clinical anatomy of
10. Ansari, MM. Rectusial fascia: a new entity of laparoscopic laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Singapore Med J 1996
live surgical anatomy. Open Acc J Surg 2017 Apr;3(4):555618. Oct; 37(5):519-521.
24