Page 26 - Journal of World Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons

Comparative Analysis of Surgical and Pathological Outcomes
decreased median length of hospital stay with similar morbidity 10. Kang SB, Park JW, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for
and mortality. Further studies and trials are required before more mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
conclusive arguments can be made to support the universal use of (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised
laparoscopy in the surgical management of rectal cancer. controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:637–645. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-
2045(10)70131-5.
11. Jeong SY, Park JW, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-
AcknowledgMents rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
We would like to acknowledge all the professors and associate (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, noninferiority,
professors of Department of Medical oncology, Radiation randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:767–774. DOI:
Oncology, and Pathology Department of Government Royapettah 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205-0.
Hospital, Chennai, for providing necessary support to conduct 12. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, et al. Colorectal cancer Laparoscopic
this analysis. or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group. Laparoscopic versus
open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of
a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(3):210–218. DOI:
references 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0.
1. Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal 13. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, et al. MRC CLASICC trial group. Short-term
excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986;1:1479–1482. DOI: 10.1016/ endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in
S0140-6736(86)91510-2. patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre,
2. Keller DS, Qiu J, et al. Predicting opportunities to increase utilization randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365(9472):1718–1726. DOI:
of laparoscopy for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2018;32:1556–2663. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2.
10.1007/s00464-017-5844-y. 14. Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical
3. Cecil TD, Taffinder N, et al. A personal view on laparoscopic rectal Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus
cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 2006;8(3):30–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463- open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2010;97(11):1638–1645.
1318.2006.01068.x. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7160.
4. Zhang FW, Zhou ZY, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for 15. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, et al. UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. Randomized
rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma:
controlled trials. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:9985–9996. DOI: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol
10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.22.9985. 2007;25(21):3061–3068. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758.
5. Piątkowski J, Jackowski M, et al. Trans anal total mesorectal excision 16. Arezzo A, Passera R, et al. Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces
(TATME) – preliminary findings. Videosurgery Miniinv 2015;10: short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review
495–498. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2015.54060. and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2013;27(5):1485–1502. DOI: 10.1007/
6. Fleshman J, Branda M, et al. Effect of laparoscopic- assisted resection s00464-012-2649-x.
vs. open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic 17. Boutros M, Hippalgaonkar N, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectal
outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term
2015;314:1346–1355. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.10529. outcomes than open surgery: a large single-centre comparative
7. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery study. Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56(6):679–688. DOI: 10.1097/
for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, DCR.0b013e318287c594.
phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:210–218. DOI: 10.1016/S1470- 18. Lee SD, Park SC, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for stage
2045(13)70016-0. I rectal cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes. World J Surg
8. Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, et al. Effect of laparoscopic- assisted 2013;37(3):646–651. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1846-z.
resection vs. open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal 19. Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, et al. Rates of circumferential resection
cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;314: margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes
1356–1363. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.12009. in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2002;235(4):449–457. DOI:
9. Pędziwiatr M, Małczak P, et al. There is no difference in outcome 10.1097/00000658-200204000-00001.
between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a 20. Lujan J, Valero G. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal
systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970
oncologic outcomes. Tech Coloproctology 2017;21:595–604. DOI: patients. Surg Endosc 2013;27(1):295–302. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-
10.1007/s10151-017-1662-4. 2444-8.

24 World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 12 Issue 1 (January–April 2019)