Page 42 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 42

Ergonomics
            the surgeons and 55–90% of the surgeons had not got any formal     13.  Hallbeck MS, Lowndes BR, Bingener J, et al. The impact of
            training in ergonomics, even though some tried to adopt the   intraoperative microbreaks with exercises on surgeons: A
            recommendations. 27                                     multicenter cohort study. Appl Ergon 2017;60:334–341. DOI: 10.1016/j.
                                                                    apergo.2016.12.006.
                                                                 14.  Steinhilber B, Seibt R, Rieger MA, et al. Development of an arm
            conclusIon                                              support system to improve ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery:
            Ergonomics appears to be a neglected facet, with 68% experien-  Study design and provisional results. Surg Endosc 2015;29(9):
            cing some or the other form of work-related musculoskeletal   2851–2858. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3984-x.
            problems. This review attempted to highlight the importance     15.  Komorowski AL, Usero DD, Rodil JRM, et al. The influence of micro-
            of these good practices. Further, this study highly recommend   pauses on surgeons’ precision after short laparoscopy procedures.
                                                                    Pol Przegl Chir 2015;87(3):116–120. DOI: 10.1515/pjs-2015-0029.
            a structured formal training program for all surgeons and     16.  Jaspers JEN, Bosma JM, Kruger AEB, et al. The mechanical master–slav
            even includes it in the curriculum. Engineering interventions,   manipulator: An instrument improving surgeons ergonomics in
            administrative interventions, and personal protective equipment   standardised task for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc Interv Tech
            are the three most important parts. Improvement must be ensured   2015;29. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9038-2.
            in these three groups to get the optimal operating environment.     17.  Perez-Duarte FJ, Sanchez-Margallo FM, Hurtado LH, et  al.
            The field of ergonomics must be given priority and relevant   Improvement in muscular workload through an ergonomic training
            attention. Ergonomic guidelines should be periodically evaluated   program. Eur Surg Res 2014;52(3):247.
            and corrected. Further work is suggested to refine the ergonomic     18.  Giberti C, Gallo F, Francini L, et al. Musculoskeletal disorders among
                                                                    robotic surgeons: A questionnaire analysis. Arch Ital Urol Androl
            practices.                                              2014;86(2):95–98. DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2014.2.95.
                                                                 19.  Rosenblatt PL, McKinney J, Adams SR. Ergonomics in the
            orcId                                                   operating room: Protecting the surgeon. J Minim Invasive Gynecol
                                                                    2013;20(6):744. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.006.
            Premkumar Anandan   https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9126-1115    20.  Dessie S, Rosenblatt PL, McKinney J. Or fitness: A dynamic warm-up
                                                                    and stretching routine for surgeons. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr
                                                                    Surg 2013;19.
            references                                           21.  Waters T, Short M, Lloyd J, et  al. AORN ergonomic tool 2: Positioning
              1.  Vijendren A, Yung M, Sanchez J. Occupational health issues amongst   and repositioning the supine patient on the OR bed. AORN J
                UK doctors: A literature review. Occup Med 2015;65(7):519–528. DOI:   2011;93(4):445–449.
                10.1093/occmed/kqv088.                           22.  Manasnayakorn S, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A, et al. Ergonomic assessment
              2.  Nimbarte AD, Sivak-Callcott JA, Zreiqat M, et al. Neck postures     of optimum operating table height for hand-assisted laparoscopic
                and cervical spine loading among microsurgeons operating with   surgery. Surg Endosc Interv Tech 2009;23(4):783–789. DOI: 10.1007/
                loupes and headlamp, IIE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors 2013;1(4):   s00464-008-0068-9.
                215–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2013.840342.    23.  Kim P, Joujiki M, Suzuki M, et al. Newly designed ergonomic surgical
              3.  Ross AM, Segal J, Borenstein D, et al. Prevalence of spinal disc disease   binocular telescope with angulated optic axis. Neurosurgery 2008;
                among interventional cardiologists. Am J Cardiol 1997;79(1):68–70.   63(1 Suppl. 1):ONS188–190. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000335035.15897.ff.
                DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00678-9.              24.  Albayrak MA, van Veelen JF, Prins CJ. A newly designed ergonomic
              4.  Khalil TM, Abdel-Moty EM, Rosomoff RS, et al. Ergonomics in Back   body support for surgeons, Surg Endosc Interv Tech 2007;21(10);
                Pain: A Guide to Prevention and Rehabilitation. Wiley Van Nostrand,   1835–1840. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9249-1.
                1993. University of Miami, Florida, pp. 32–37.    25.  Trejo A, Hallbeck MS, Oleynikov D, et al. Effect of handle design
              5.  Bartal G, Vano E, Paulo G. Incidence, prevention and management    and target location on insertion and aim with a laparoscopic surgical
                of musculoskeletal pain in IR. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010;   tool. Appl Ergon 2007;38(6):745–753. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.
                33(Suppl. 2):60–61.                                 12.004.
              6.  Moore be, Casola G, Novelline RA, et al. The relationship between back     26.  Berquer R, Smith WD, Davis S. An ergonomic study of the optimum
                pain and lead apron use in radiologists. Am J Roentgenol 1992;158(1):   operating table height for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc
                191–193. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.158.1.1530763.            2002;16(3):416–421. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-8190-y.
               7.  Pelz DM. Low back pain, lead aprons, and the angiographer. Am J     27.  Stucky C-CH, Cromwell KD, Voss RK, et al. Surgeon symptoms, strain,
                Neuroradiol 2000;21(7):1364. PMID: 10954297.        and selections: Ssystematic review and meta-analysis of surgical
              8.  Savage C. Comparison of the zero gravity system to conventional   ergonomics. Ann Med Surg 2018;27:1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.
                lead apron for radiation protection of the interventionalist. J Vasc   2017.12.013.
                Intervent Radiol 2009;20(S53). DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-01203.    28.  Park A, Lee G, Seagull FJ, et al. Patients benefit while surgeons suffer:
              9.  Yang K, Perez M, Hossu G, et al. “Alarm-corrected” ergonomic armrest   An impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg 2010;210(3):306–313. DOI:
                use could improve learning curves of novices on robotic simulator.   10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.10.017.
                Surg Endosc Interv Tech 2017;31(1):100–106. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-    29.  Cass GKS, Vyas S, Akande V. Prolonged laparoscopic surgery is
                016-4934-6.                                         associated with an increased risk of vertebral disc prolapse. J Obstet
              10.  Voss RK, Chiang YJ, Cromwell KD, et al. Do no harm, except to   Gynaecol 2014;34(1):74–78. DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2013.831048.
                ourselves? A survey of symptoms and injuries in oncologic surgeons     30.  Janki S, Mulder EEAP, IJzermans JNM, et al. Tran, Ergonomics in the
                and pilot study of an intraoperative ergonomic intervention. J Am   operating room, Surg Endosc 2017;31(6):2457–2466. DOI: 10.1007/
                Coll Surg 2017;224(1):16–25.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.09.013.  s00464-016-5247-5.
              11.  Biligere S, Durai P, Heng CT, et al. Modified ergonomic lithotripsy     31.  Park AE, Zahiri HR, Hallbeck MS, et al. Intraoperative “micro breaks”
                (MEL) with LithoVueTM: Maximising ergonomics in flexible   with targeted stretching enhance surgeon physical function and
                ureterorenoscopy (FURS). BJU Int 2017;119:7. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.   mental focus: A multicenter cohort study Ann Surg 2017;265(2):
                668928.                                             340–346. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001665.
              12.  Liu S, Hemming D, DeLong JC, et al. Solving the surgeon ergonomic     32.  Sivak-Callcott JA, Mancinelli CA, Nimbarte AD. Cervical occupational
                crisis with surgical exosuit. Surg Endosc 2018;32(1): 236–244. DOI:   hazards in ophthalmic plastic surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2015;
                10.1007/s00464-017-5667-x.                          26(5):392–398. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000182.



                                                       World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 16 Issue 1 (January–April 2023)  41
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47