Page 45 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 45

Dysphagia after Bougie-guided Crural Repair
            Preoperative Evaluation
            Preoperative assessment of the patients was done by a detailed
            history taking and physical examination. A 24-hour PH monitoring,
            upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, and esophageal manometry
            were done for all patients to reach the exact diagnosis of refractory
            GERD, to exclude esophageal motility disorders or achalasia and also
            to detect any esophagitis or Barrett’s esophagus caused by GERD.
               As posted by DeMeester et al., pathologic reflux was defined
                                                  11
            by esophageal acid exposure with a DeMeester score  greater than
                                                     1
            14 without having any proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).  However,
            amplitudes of 30 mm Hg of mean distal esophageal contraction and
            failed peristalsis in less than half of the esophageal contractions were   Fig. 1: Bougie introduction after taking a posterior crural stitch
            deemed normal. The use of any pre-operative PPIs was recorded.  showing the direction of the esophageal descent through the hiatus
                                                               and complete closure of the posterior defect was done guided by the
            Surgical Technique                                 bougie, leaving a small gap anteriorly
            The operation was carried out under general anesthesia. A
            prophylactic dose of IV antibiotics was given during the induction.
               The patients were placed in a supine position with abducted
            both legs and arms along with the table in reverse Trendelenburg
            position where the surgeon stood between the legs and the
            cameraman to the patient’s right side.
               A five-trocar approach was applied, where a 12-mm optical
            port (used to create pneumoperitoneum) was placed in Palmer’s
            point. A 5-mm trocar was placed just below the xiphoid process;
            another 5-mm port at the left anterior axillary line and one in the
            right mid-clavicular line. The liver was retracted by a self-retained
            S-shaped liver retractor through the upper 5-mm port opening.
               Greater omentum was transected with an energy device
            (Ligasure–Medtronic) starting high up 4-cm distal to the hiatal   Fig. 2: Single anterior stitch was taken to close the anterior gap and
            hernia. Dissection of the greater omentum was done till complete   smooth passage is checked using a 50 Fr bougie
            identification of left crus with great importance to divide all the
            short gastric vessels above the starting point allowing complete
            mobilization of the fundus of the stomach.         Table 1: Frequency and degree of postoperative dysphagia based on
                                                                                     12
                                                               the classification of Saeed et al.
               The gastro–hepatic ligament was then transected followed
            by dissection of the right crus, allowing about 2–3 cm of the distal   Frequency and degree of postoperative dysphagia
            esophagus to be in the abdomen. Dissection was done carefully   0 = Unable to swallow.
            with attention not to injure the posterior vagus trunk during the   I = Swallowing liquids with difficulty, solids impossible.
            posterior dissection.
               After identifying the hiatal hernia and the confluence of   II = Swallowing liquids without difficulty, solids impossible.
            both crura, a stitch approximating the right and left crus was   III = Occasionally difficulty swallowing with solids.
            taken posteriorly. Then guided by a 50 Fr bougie, inserted by an   IV = Rarely difficulty swallowing with solids.
            experienced anesthetist from the mouth down to the stomach, the
            direction of the esophagus was identified and further stitches to   V = Swallowing normally.
            close the hernial defect were taken either posteriorly, anteriorly, or
            both according to the hiatal size using interrupted non-absorbable   anesthetist to avoid tight wrap. The last stitch was taken between
            2/0 Ethibond sutures Figures 1 and 2.              the wrap and the right crus to fix the wrap and prevent its displace-
               A short redundant posterior 360° fundoplication wrap was   ment. The operative time and complications either during or after
            performed using the properly mobilized fundus. A “shoe-shine”   the operation were recorded.
            maneuver to ensure a tension-free wrap was done. A 1–2 cm fun-  Postoperatively, patients were discharged on the second
            doplication wrap was done around the delivered intraabdominal   postoperative day. The oral clear fluids were allowed for the first
            esophagus using interrupted non-absorbable 2/0 Ethibond sutures.   24 h, then soft diet for the following 7 days.
            The first suture included bites from the fundus of the stomach on   Follow-up was carried out by phone or clinic attendance at
            both sides of the esophagus and a fine bite of the anterior wall of   2 weeks, 1–6 months postoperatively to assess the postoperative
            the esophagus to prevent slippage of the wrap. Then one or two   GI symptoms, PPI intake, GERD–HRQL questionnaire which was
            stitches were taken above the first stitch (the first stitch was around   collected at 1 and 6 months postoperatively for all the patients.
            the GEJ so all the stitches should be above, but not below, the first   Both frequency and severity of postoperative dysphagia were
                                                                                                       12
            stitch to avoid an improper wrapping of the stomach around itself).   evaluated using a classification defined by Saeed et al. who scored
            The second or third stitches were taken only between the stomach   the ability to swallow from 0 to 5 in which the lowest score was given
            sidewall around the esophagus but not fixed to its anterior wall   for the inability to swallow and the highest for normal swallowing
            guided by the intraesophageal bougie that moved in and out by the   (Table 1). Early dysphagia was defined by having dysphagia that


                                                        World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 15 Issue 2 (May–August 2022)  141
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50