Page 25 - tmp
P. 25

Laparoscopic Two-stage Hepatectomy
            Strategy for Hepatectomy                           laparoscopic and open approaches. Generally, mobilization of the
            Two-stage hepatectomy was indicated for advanced metastases   right hemiliver is performed laparoscopically, and transection of
                                                      6
            requiring extensive liver resection. A prediction score  of 50 or   liver parenchyma is performed under minimum laparotomy as
                                                                               7
            more, calculated using the formula −84.6 + 0.933a + 1.11b + 0.999c   previously reported.  Planning for the second procedure must be
            with a as the anticipated resection fraction (%), b as the indocyanine   flexible, with minimization when FLR hypertrophy is suboptimal.
            green retention rate at 15 minutes (ICGR15, %), and c as patient age   Multiple small resections avoiding excessive tumor-free margins
            in years indicated treatment with a two-stage hepatectomy.  are performed using an open approach.
               Most first procedures involved resection of metastases from   Terminology and Analyzed Parameters
            the hemiliver intended to become the future liver remnant (FLR),
            followed by portal vein embolization (PVE) directed to the contralateral   The Brisbane 2000 terminology of the International Hepato-
            hemiliver. FLR volume was measured by computed tomography   Pancreato-Biliary Association was used to designate operative
                                                                        8
            3 weeks after the first hepatectomy. The second hepatectomy to   procedures.  Morbidities were assessed according to the Clavien–
                                                                                  9
            resect the deportalized hemiliver typically was performed 4 weeks   Dindo (CD) classification.
            after the first procedure. When FLR volume was considered insufficient,   Statistical Analysis
            completion surgery was postponed until sufficient FLR volume was
            attained or a smaller hepatectomy that initially planned was considered   Continuous variables, analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test, are
            because of rapid tumor growth during the interval period.  expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables,
                                                               expressed as numbers followed by percentages in parentheses,
            Laparoscopic Procedures                            were analyzed with Fisher’s exact test. A difference was considered
            The laparoscopic procedure began with the open insertion of an   significant when the two-sided p-value was below 0.05. All statistical
            umbilical 12-mm port; five or six additional ports were used as well.   analyses were carried out using SPSS statistical software (version
            Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed initially to confirm the absence   23; IBC SPSS, Chicago, Illinois).
            of metastases in extrahepatic sites. Liver parenchymal transection
            was performed while maintaining a 12 mm Hg pneumoperitoneum,   results
            which was increased to up to 20 mm Hg if bleeding was encountered.   Details of three patients with laparoscopic two-stage hepatectomy
            Laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasonography was used routinely to   (two men, and one woman; mean age, 67.0 ± 7.2 years) are shown
            guide resection and confirm resectability. Parenchymal transection   in Table 1. The first-stage hepatectomy consisted of laparoscopic
            was performed with a combination of a cavitron ultrasonic surgical   lateral sectionectomy or resection of segment 3. All three patients
            aspirator system (Valley Lab, Boulder, Colorado) and a soft-  underwent PVE to the contralateral hemiliver via the iliac vein
            coagulation system (ERBE Elektromedizin, Tübingen, Germany).   during the first-stage laparoscopic hepatectomy. Second-stage
            During parenchymal transection, Pringle’s maneuver was performed   hepatectomy was performed after a mean interval of 37.3 ± 10.7 days
            to control vascular inflow, with 15 minutes of occlusion followed by   following first-stage resection. Adhesions were considered minimal
            5 minutes of release. The resected specimen was placed in a plastic   on assessment during the second-stage procedure in all patients.
            bag and retrieved through the umbilical incision after both cranial   Metastatic tumors were removed from the right hemiliver at second-
            and caudal extensions.                             stage hepatectomy using an open approach in two patients and
               PVE was attempted through the extended umbilical incision   a hybrid laparoscopic and open approach in the other patient. In
            after retrieval of the specimen. The ileum was pulled out through the   the two patients undergoing open second-stage hepatectomy,
            extended incision. For PVE, a 7-Fr catheter was inserted through an   part of the deportalized hemiliver was left in place because
            ileocolic vein, after which the portal branches of the hemiliver targeted   remnant liver hypertrophy and liver function were compromised
            for resection were embolized. The embolic material was a mixture   by prehepatectomy chemotherapy. We resected segment 8 and
            of gelatin pellets (Gelfoam powder; Upjohn, Kalamazoo, Michigan)   performed multiple partial hepatectomies in one patient. Another
            and oleic acid monoethanolamine (Oldamine; Grelan, Tokyo, Japan).   underwent resection of segment 7 extending to 8 in addition to
            After restaging following PVE, patients were suitably scheduled for   resection of the right hepatic vein (with preservation of the right
            a second-stage resection to remove tumors from the remnant liver.  inferior hepatic vein) and partial resection of segments 5 and 6. The
               Our standard approach at the second-stage hepatectomy   third patient was treated with a hybrid approach including posterior
            following a laparoscopic first hepatectomy is a hybrid of   sectionectomy extended to segment 8 with preservation of the right
            Table 1: Characteristics and operative feasibility of patients undergoing two-stage hepatectomy
                                                               Resected   Duration,   Blood loss,       Hospital
                     No. of   Maximum            Procedures    volume, gm  minute  mL        Morbidity, %  stay, days
               Gender  tumors  diameter, mm  PVE  First/second  First/second  First/second First/second First/second  First/second
            1 Male   11     35          Performed Lateral section/  175/223  230/374  500/700  None/none  8/10
                                                 segment 8 + P
            2 Female   6    40          Performed Lateral section/  190/317  255/455  378/700  None/CD-I  5/14
                                                 Ext. posterior
                                                 section
            3 Male     5    33          Performed Segment 3/Ext.     54/264  238/559  380/635  None/CD-IIIb  9/31
                                                 segment 7 + P
            No., number; PVE, portal vein embolization; first, first hepatectomy; second, second hepatectomy; section, sectionectomy; segment, segmentectomy;
            P, partial hepatectomy; Ext., extended to; CD, Clavien–Dindo

                                                        World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 14 Issue 2 (May–August 2021)  91
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30