Page 66 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 66

A Novel Technique Using Mesh to Repair a Recurrent Large Indirect Inguinoscrotal Hernia
            and to avoid superior leverage of mesh by the cord structures, thus   references
            reducing the risk of recurrence.
               Currently, evidence for a reduction in recurrence by the slit     1.  Belyansky I, Tsirline VB, Klima DA, et al. Prospective, comparative
                                                                    study of postoperative quality of life in TEP, TAPP, and modified
                                            8
            mesh placement technique is inconclusive.  There are only three   Lichtenstein repairs. Ann Surg 2011;254(5):709–715. DOI: 10.1097/
            studies comparing the outcomes of slit vs non-slit mesh during a   SLA.0b013e3182359d07.
            laparoscopic TAPP repair. 11,12,14  Although these studies failed to prove     2.  Pawlak M, Tulloh B, de Beaux A. Current trends in hernia surgery in
            an advantageous difference with slit mesh in terms of recurrence   NHS England. AnnR Coll Surg Engl 2020;102(1):25–27. DOI: 10.1308/
            rate, none of them are well designed randomised controlled trials.  rcsann.2019.0118.
               Leibl et al. suggested that some recurrences are associated     3.  Saber A, Hokkam EN, Ellabban GM. Laparoscopic transabdominal
                                          12
            with insufficient closure of the mesh slit.  This may be due to two   preperitoneal approach for recurrent inguinal hernia: A randomized
            reasons. First, it has been well documented that mesh shrinkage is a   trial. J Minim Access Surg 2015;11(2):123–128. DOI: 10.4103/0972-
                                                                    9941.153809.
                                         15
            major issue in laparoscopic hernia repair.  It is generally recognized     4.  Bracale U, Melillo P, Pignata G, et al.  Which is the best laparoscopic
            that intraperitoneally placed mesh will shrink up to 40% and lose its   approach for inguinal hernia repair: TEP or TAPP? A systematic
                                        16
            flexibility considerably, after five years.  Second, gas insufflation of   review of the literature with a network meta-analysis. Surg Endosc
            the abdominal cavity is a crucial element in laparoscopic surgery   2012;26(12):3355–3366. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2382-5.
            which significantly expands the abdominal surface volume. The     5.  Saber A, Ellabban GM, Gad MA, et al.  Open preperitoneal versus
            effects of abdominal deflation after surgery and the anticipated mesh   anterior approach for recurrent inguinal hernia: a randomized study.
            shrinkage over time may therefore result in dislodgment of the cord   BMC Surg 2012;12(1):22. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-12-22.
            structure from the slit. Therefore, by anchoring the two trouser flaps     6.  Campanelli G, Pettinari D, Nicolosi FM, et al.  Inguinal hernia
                                                                    recurrence: classification and approach. Hernia 2006;10(2):159–161.
            of the mesh slit together around the cord structures, a secure fixation   DOI: 10.1007/s10029-005-0053-3.
            point is created. This fixation point anchors the mesh in a consistent     7.  Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia
            location, which helps to ensure coverage of the myopectineal orifice   Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult
                                       17
            despite the effects of mesh shrinkage.  Moreover, this also refashions   patients. Hernia 2009;13(4):343–403. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-009-
            a deep artificial ring to prevent re-entry of intra-abdominal content   0529-7.
            through the defective deep inguinal ring. Regarding concerns of     8.  Bracale U, Andreuccetti J, Sodo M, et al. Lack of advantages of slit
            circumferential scaring causing postoperative pain, there is no   mesh placement during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal
            evidence of spermatic cord injury caused by slit mesh reported. 18  inguinal hernia repair (TAPP): a single-center, case-matched study.
                                                                    BMC Surg 2018;18(1):75. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-018-0409-0.
               Finally, fixation of mesh edges onto the abdominal wall     9.  Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, et al. Open mesh
            distributes tension across the mesh surface, hence smoothing out   versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med
            the folds. The secured positioning prevents ‘windsock’ effect, where   2004;350(18):1819–1827. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040093.
            the mesh becomes distally displaced as it may travel along the cord     10.  Fitzgibbons RJ, Puri V. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am Surg
            if it were only fixed onto it.                          2006;72(3):197–206.
                                                                 11.  Leibl BJ, Kraft B, Redecke JD, et al. Are postoperative complaints and
                                                                    complications influenced by different techniques in fashioning and
            conclusion                                              fixing the mesh in transperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty? Results
            We conclude that the creation of a new deep ring around the cord   of a prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 2002;26(12):1481–
            structures using a slit mesh and tacks is a novel and successful   1484. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-002-6204-0.
            technique that could be used to repair large recurrent inguinal     12.  Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Schwarz J, et al. A single institution’s experience
            hernias laparoscopically to minimize further recurrence.  with transperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg
                                                                    1998;175(6):446–452. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00074-9.
                                                                 13.  Yang XF, Liu JL. Anatomy essentials for laparoscopic inguinal hernia
            declArAtions                                            repair. Ann Transl Med 2016;4(19):372. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.
                                                                    09.32.
            Ethics approval and consent to participate: This research does     14.  Velasco JM, Gelman C, Vallina VL. Preperitoneal bilateral inguinal
            not require Ethics Committee approval. All the procedures have   herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc 1996;10(2):122–127. DOI: 10.1007/
            been performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of   BF00188356.
            1964 and later versions.                             15.  Jonas J. The problem of mesh shrinkage in laparoscopic incisional
                                                                    hernia repair. Zentralbl Chir 2009;134(3):209–213. DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-
            Consent for publication: Written informed consent was obtained   1098779. 
            from the patient regarding the publication of this paper and the     16.  Brown CN, Finch JG. Which mesh for hernia repair? Ann R Coll Surg
            associated images.                                      Engl 2010;92(4):272–278. DOI: 10.1308/003588410X12664192076
                                                                    296.
            Availability of data and material: Not applicable.    17.  Claus C, Furtado M, Malcher F, et al. Ten golden rules for a safe MIS
                                                                    inguinal hernia repair using a new anatomical concept as a guide. Surg
            orcid                                                   Endosc 2020;34(4):1458–1464. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07449-z.
                                                                 18.  Celik AS, Memmi N, Celebi F, et al. Impact of slit and nonslit
            Ho L Chong:   https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8313-1791     mesh technique on testicular perfusion and volume in the early
            Andrew N Wilson:   https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0269-159X  and late postoperative period of the totally extraperitoneal
            Alexandrina Braniste:   https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2182-4570  preperitoneal technique in patients with inguinal hernia. Am J Surg
            Adnan Taib:   https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-1585     2009;198(2):287–291. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.038.







                                                       World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 14 Issue 1 (January–April 2021)  67
   61   62   63   64   65   66