Page 14 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Practical Considerations for Common Duct Stone Clearance

must anticipate possible friable cystic duct, increase bleeding REFERENCES
or a distorted anatomy. Presence of these inflammatory changes 1. Consensus Development Panel. Gallstones and laparoscopic
makes the surgery hazardous to the patient 27,28 hence open cholecystectomy. (National Institutes of Health Consensus
technique or postoperative endoscopic clearance must be in Development Panel on Gallstone and Laparoscopic
mind. Cholecystectomy). JAMA 1993;269(8):1018-24.
Morphology of the stone is very important to consider when 2. Ko CW and Lee SP. Epidemiology and natural history of common
choosing the optimum procedure. Proximal stone is less bileduct stones and prediction of disease. Review. Gastrointestinal
amenable to LTCCBDE. Large stone may not pass through the Endoscopy 2002;56(6 Suppl):S165-69. [MEDLINE: 1247261]
cystic duct. CDS larger than 9 mm are hard to remove via 3. Lezoche E, Paganini AM. Technical considerations and
laparoscopicbile duct exploration: transcystic and
transcystic route. choledochotomy. Seminars in Surgery 2000;7(4):262-78.
4. Soltan et al. A simple scoring system for predicting bileduct
Institutional Limitations stones in patients with cholelithiasis. Journal of Gastrointestinal
Surgery 2001;5(4):434-37.
In the treatment of CDS, the hospital considers the availability 5. Fletcher D R. Changes in the practice of biliary surgery and
of a good team of laparoscopic surgeons, presence of expert ERCPduring the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
endoscopist and cost-effectiveness of the procedure. As to Australia: Their possible significance. Australian and New
compared to cholecystectomy, the presence of CDS significantly Zealand Journal of Surgery 1994;64(2):75-80.
increases the mortality, morbidity and cost of treatment of the 6. Sgourakis G, Karaliotas K. Laparoscopic common bile
patients. The choice of doing a single stage LTCCBDE shortens ductexploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone
hospital stay, lower cost, and lower mortality and morbidity extractionand laparoscopic cholecystectomy for
choledocholithiasis. Aprospective randomized study. Minerva
when compared to LC with second stage ERCP/ES. 27 Chir 2002;57:467-74.
In the absence of laparoscopic skill or equipment, LC with 7. Cuschieri A, et al. EAES multicenter prospective randomized
postoperative ERCP/ES may be the proper procedure to use. trial comparing two-stage vssingle-stage management of patients
with gallstone disease andductal calculi. Surg Endosc 1999;13:952-
Technical Expertise 957.
8. Nathanson LK, et al. Postoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic
In advance medical centers, a complete choice of operative and choledochotomy for clearance of selectedbile duct calculi: A
nonoperative management of CDS stone may be used. randomized trial. Ann Surg 2005;242:188-92.
Operative management includes transcystic CBDE, 9. Rhodes M, et al. Laparoscopicexploration of the common bile
flouroscopic wirebasket retrieval, ampullary balloon dilatation, duct: Lessons learned from 129 consecutive cases. Br J Surg
1995;82:666-68.
Lap CBDE, antergrade transcystic sphincterotomy, and open 10. Martin DJ, et al Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile
CBDE all of which presents their own advantages and duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Apr
disadvantages. Nonoperative management includes ERCP/ES, 2006;19:CD003327.
Percutaneous transhepatic stone removal, and observation. 11. Cisek PI, Greaney GC. The role of endoscopic retrograde
When all of the armamentarium for the treatment of CDS are cholangiopancreatography with laparoscopic cholecystectomy
present in the institution, decision is hinged on the analysis of in the management of choledocholithiasis. Am Surg 1994;60:772-
established parameters. 76.
12. Graham SM, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common
bile duct stones. The utility of planned perioperative endoscopic
CONCLUSION retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy: Experience with
Based on analyzed data from the literature search, open CBDE 63 patients. Ann Surg 1993;218:61-67.
is still a valid procedure in the era of laparoscopy when the 13. Jung LU, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative
ERCP. Surg Rounds 1996;19:406-12.
intended procedure is open cholecystectomy or if the medical 14. Fiore NF, et al. An analysis of perioperative cholangiography in
condition precludes the use of laparoscopy. CDS when one thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies.Surgery 1997;122:
discovered during the course of LC is treated best with 817-21.
LTCCBDE. If the surgeon fails in the transcystic approach, 15. Berthou JC, Drouard F, Charbonneau P, Moussaier K 1998.
either LCBDE, Intraoperative or postoperative ERCP/ES may 16. Evaluation of laparoscopic management of common bile
be carried out. ductstones in 220 patients. Surg Endosc 12:16-22.
There are varying circumstances that may affect the choice 17. Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Phillips EH. Laparoscopic
transcysticcholedochoscopy. Surg 1994;8:310-14.
29
of procedure for CDS. Surgeons may best serve their patients 18. Carroll BJ, Phillips EH, Dayakhovsky L. Laparoscopic
if parameters other than that used in standardized treatment are choledoscopy: An effective approach to the common bile duct.
considered in choosing the best option for the patient. J Laparoendosc Surg 1992;2:15-21.

World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, September-December 2009;2(3):11-14 13