Page 33 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

WJOLS

Comparison between Robotic Radical Hysterectomy with Laparoscopic and Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy
robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy and prospective 9. Tinelli R, Malzoni M, Cosentino F, perone C, Fusco A,
comparisons with traditional radical hysterectomy will Cicinelli E, Nezhat F. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical
show a benefit of this minimal access surgery. hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early
prospective randomized controlled trials will give cervical cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 2011
Sep;18(9):2622-2628.
more definite results, especially concerning surgical out- 10. Lee EJ, Kang H, Kim DH. A comparative study of laparoscopic
comes comparing robotic and laparoscopic techniques. radical hysterectomy with radical abdominal hysterectomy
for early-stage cervical cancer: a long-term follow-up study.
COnCLuSiOn Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011 May;156(1):83-86.
11. Lowe Mp, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson pR,
Robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy, facilitates the Tillmans TD. A multiinstitutional experience with robotic-
better surgical approach in comparison to laparoscopy in assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
the treatment of early cervical cancer. It is superior due to Gynecol Oncol 2009 May;113(2):191-194.
its steady 3-dimensional visualization, instrumentation 12. Lowe Mp, Hoekstra AV, Jairam-Thodla A, Singh DK,
Buttin BM, Lurain JR, Schink JC. A comparison of robot-
with articulating tips, and an adaptive downscaling of assisted and traditional radical hysterectomy for early-stage
the surgeons movements without tremor, allowing very cervical cancer. J Robotic Surg 2009;3:19-23.
selective dissection and good clinical end point result. 13. Estape R, Lambrou N, Diaz R, Estape E, Dunkin N, Rivera A.
A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy
ACknOwLEdgMEnT with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and
laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2009 Jun;113(3):357-361.
I would like to express my sincere thanks to prof RK 14. Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky K.
Mishra for having given me an opportunity to attend Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radi-
the Fellowship and Diploma In Minimal Access Surgery cal hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment
of early cervical cancer. JSLS 2008 Jul-Sep;12(3):227-237.
program, including a one day introduction and hand on 15. Nam EJ, Kim SW. A case control study of robotic radical hys-
training with real da Vinci robot, in laparoscopic training terectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arm
course at World Laparoscopy Hospital, Gurgaon, NCR compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical
Delhi, 122 002, India. cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010 Oct 20;20(7):1284-1289.
16. Sert MB, Eraker R. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in
REfEREnCES gynecological oncology; initial experience at Oslo Radium
hospital and 16 months follow-up. Int J Medical Robotics and
1. GLOBOCAN 2008. Cancer fact sheet. Incidence, mortality. Computer Assisted Surg 2009;5(4):410-414.
Internet. Acessed on Feb 18, 2012. 17. Uccella S, Ghezzi F, Mariani A, Cromi A, Bogani G, Serati
2. Nam J-H, park J-H, Kim D-Y, Kim Y-H, Kim Y-M, Kim Y-T. M, Bolis p. Vaginal cuff closure after minimally invasive
Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the
cervical cancer: long term survival outcomes in a match literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011 Aug;205(2):119.e1-12.
cohort study. Ann Oncol 2012 August 12. 18. Nick AM, Lange J, Frumovitz M, Soliman pT, Schmeler KM,
3. Claerhout F, Deprest J. Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign Schlumbrecht Mp, dos Reis R, Ramirez pT. Rate of vaginal
diseases. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2005;19(3):357-375. cuff separation following laparoscopic or robotic hysterec-
4. Mishra RK. Textbook of practical laparoscopic surgery. tomy. Gynecol Oncol 2011 Jan;120(1):47-51.
2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical publishers (p) 19. Kho RM, Akl MN, Cornella JL, Magtibay pM, Wechter ME,
LTD; 2009. Magrina JF. Incidence and characteristics of patients with
5. Renato S, Mohammed M, Serena S, Giulia M, Diego R, Ric- vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic procedures. Obstet
cardo S. Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical Gynecol 2009 Aug;114(2 pt 1):231-235.
cancer: review of surgical and oncological outcomes. Obstet 20. Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero Ap, Magtibay pM.
Gynecol 2011;2011:872434. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy
6. Salicrú S, Gil-Moreno A, Montero A, Roure M, pérez- and laparotomy. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;109(1):86-91.
Benavente A, Xercavins J. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy 21. Ko EM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, Feltmate CM. Robotic versus
with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single
cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):555-568. institution. Gynecol Oncol 2008 Dec;111(3):425-430.
7. Sert MB, Abeler V. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hys- 22. Boggess JF, Gehrig pA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skin-
terectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy ner EN, Fowler WC. A case-control study of robot-assisted
and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon’s experi- type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissec-
ence at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. Gynecol Oncol 2011 tion compared with open radical hysterectomy.Am J Obstet
Jun 1;121(3):600-604. Gynecol 2008 Oct;199(4):357.e1-7.
8. Kruijdenberg CB, van den Einden LC, Hendriks JC, Zusterzeel 23. Cantrell LA, Mendivil A, Gehrig pA, Boggess JF. Survival
pL, Bekkers RL. Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical
hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review. Gynecol Oncol hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gyne-
2011 Mar;120(3):334-339. cologic Oncology 2010;117(2):260-265.

World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, January-April 2015;8(1):26-31 31