Page 37 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

WJOLS

Laparoscopic Surgery in Low-income and Limited-resource Settings: Does It safely add Value?
CONCLUSION 5. Agha R, Muir G. Does laparoscopic surgery spell the end of
the open surgeon? J R Soc Med 2003 Nov;96(11):544-546.
Laparoscopic surgery is a feasible undertaking in low- 6. Raiga J, Kasia JM, Bruhat MA. Laparoscopic surgery in the
income countries with all of the known added value of Cameroon. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999 Apr;65(1):65-66.
minimally invasive surgeries in this setting. Investment 7. Murphy AA, Nager CW, Wujek JJ, Kettel LM, Torp VA,
into access to this important surgical intervention by Chin HG. Operative laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the
key stakeholders is paramount, and many challenges management of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective trial. Fertil
Steril 1992 Jun;57(6):1180-1185.
encountered can be easily overcome by making persistent, 8. Sculpher M, Manca A, Abbott J, Fountain J, Mason S,
standardized training of surgeons and theater support Garry R. Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hyster-
staff a priority. Furthermore, a surgical outcome registry, ectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from
maintained at the national level, with regular audits a randomised trial. BMJ 2004 Jan 17;328(7432):134.
conducted by institutions offering laparoscopic surgery 9. Chao TE, Mandigo M, Opoku-Anane J, Maine R. Systematic
in low-resource settings is critical, and a best-practice, review of laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income
countries: benefits, challenges, and strategies. Surg Endosc
safe-oriented clinical guideline should be developed and 2016 Jan;30(1):1-10.
implemented on a larger scale. Laparoscopic surgery does 10. Mboudou E, Morfaw FL, Foumane P, Sama JD, Mbatsogo BA,
add value in low-resource settings and is a safe alternative Minkande JZ. Gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: eight
to the traditional open modalities of surgery. years experience in the Yaounde Gynaeco-Obstetric and
Paediatric Hospital, Cameroon. Trop Doct 2014 Apr;44(2):
REFERENCES 71-76.
11. Tintara H, Leetanaporn R. Cost-benefit analysis of laparo-
1. Shrime MG, Bickler SW, Alkire BC, Mock C. Global burden of scopic adnexectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995 Jul;50(1):
surgical disease: an estimation from the provider perspective. 21-25.
Lancet Glob Health 2015 Apr 27;3(Suppl 2):S8-S9. 12. Clegg-Lamptey JN, Amponsah G. Laparoscopic cholecystec-
2. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, tomy at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana: an
Lipsitz SR, Berry WR, Gawande AA. An estimation of the initial report. West Afr J Med 2010 Mar-Apr;29(2):113-116.
global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on 13. Galukande M, Jombwe J. Feasibility of laparoscopic surgery
available data. Lancet 2008 Jul 12;372(9633):139-144. in a limited resource setting: cost containment, skills transfer
3. Gnanara JJ, Xiang X, Khiangte H. High quality surgical care and outcomes. East Cent Afr J Surg 2011 Jul/Aug;16(2):112-117.
at low cost: the diagnostic camp model of Burrows Memorial 14. Ryder RM, Vaughan MC. Laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
Christian Hospital. Indian J Surg 2007 Dec;69(6):243-247. Methods, effectiveness, and sequelae. Obstet Gynecol Clin
4. Gawande A. World Health Organization. Patient safety, WHO North Am 1999 Mar;26(1):83-97.
guidelines for safe surgery 2009: safe surgery saves lives. Geneva 15. Bendinelli C, Leal T, Moncade F, Dieng M, Toure CT, Miccoli P.
(Switzerland): World Health Organization, Patient Safety; Endoscopic surgery in Senegal. Benefits, costs and limits.
2009. p. 1 [online resource (1 PDF file (124p))]. Surg Endosc 2002 Oct;16(10):1488-1492.

World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2016;9(2):82-85 85