Page 5 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 5

WJOLS



                              Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy—A Novel Surgical Tool for Weight Loss in morbidly Obese Patients
























            Fig. 2: Starting point of sleeve gastrectomy after omentolysis   Fig. 3: Resected specimen
                       using 1st green fire (Endo GIA)


          pylorus up to the gastroesophageal junction using the  •  Quantitative variables were compared using unpaired
          harmonic scalpel. The orogastric tube was then removed   t test/Mann–Whitney test (when the datasets were not
          and replaced by a 38-French (Fr) gastric calibration   normally distributed) between the two groups.
          tube placed in the stomach by the anesthesiologist and  •  Qualitative variables were correlated using chi-square
          guided laparoscopically to sit on the lesser curvature   test/Fisher’s exact test. The p-value of < 0.05 was con-
          of the stomach up to the pylorus. The first two 60 mm   sidered statistically significant.
          green cartridge (Endo GIA Stappler) was used to divide   The data was entered in MS EXCEL spreadsheet, and
          the stomach starting 3 to 5 cm proximal to the pylorus.   analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social
          Next 60 mm blue cartridges were used to complete the   Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0. All of the results are pre-
          division of the remainder of the stomach. The specimen   sented as two-tailed values with statistical significance
          was then taken out of the abdominal cavity through the   defined as p < 0.05.
          12 mm port. The bougie was then removed, and leak test
          was performed with by air insufflations test. We routinely   RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS
          performed transfascial closure our all 12 mm ports. We   A total of 60 patients were operated for morbid obesity
          routinely put 24 Fr abdominal drain along the sleeve.  of the age from 27 to 55 years with a mean of 41.53 ±
                                                              8.89 years, and the male-to-female ratio is 3:7. The patients
          Postoperative Period                                were selected randomly who came to our OutPatient

          Patients were observed in the high-dependency unit for   Department (OPD). All patients were thoroughly inves-
          the first night after the procedure. Patients were encour-  tigated for any reversible causes of obesity as well as any
          aged to sit out of bed and chest physiotherapy using   psychiatric, cardiac, and respiratory problems including
          incentive spirometry on the evening after surgery in   obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
          order to minimize postoperative atelectasis. No leak test   Postoperatively all patients were strictly followed up
          was done postoperatively. Patients were allowed clear   as per the research protocol, that is, at 1st, 2nd, 4th, and
          liquid on postoperative day 1 along with maintenance   12th weeks and were given same diet plan for the first
          intravenous fluid. Antibiotic and prokinetics/antiemetic   three months of the follow-up.
                                                                 The mean weight of the all morbidly obese patients
          were continued for a period of 5 days and 14 days respec-  preoperatively was 111.03 ± 8.78 kg (100–130) and the mean
          tively. Patients were discharged and followed up at 1st,   height was 1.6 gm (1.5–1.73). On follow-up, the mean
          2nd, 4th, and 12th weeks. At each follow-up visit, weight   weight at 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 12th weeks reduced to 109 ± 8.23,
          loss was evaluated.
                                                              107.2 ± 7.88, 103.37 ± 7.81, and 96.63 ± 7.06 kg respectively.
                                                              On statistical analysis it was found to be significant
          STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
                                                              (p-value <0.05).
          Categorical variables were presented in number and     Similarly, the mean BMI of all the patients was
                                                                             2
          percentage (%) and continuous variables were presented  43.68 ± 3.75 kg/m  (37.63–56.44). Preoperatively and on
          as mean ± SD and median. Statistical tests were applied  follow-up the mean BMI reduced to 42.9 ± 3.52, 42.09 ± 3.26,
                                                                                           2
          as follows:                                         40.55 ± 3.14, and 38.01 ± 2.31 kg/m  at 1st, 2nd, 4th, and
          World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, September-December 2016;9(3):107-113                      109
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10