Page 4 - wjols
P. 4

Ten-point Strategy for Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
               Patients were monitored postoperatively for hospital stay, pain,   One-third of cholecystic plate was cleared by rule in all
            nausea, vomiting, oral intake, and other complications.  patients, and two points were assigned. If one-third cholecystic
                                                               plate was not cleared, no point was assigned. Sixth, following all
            Ten-point Strategy                                 the aforementioned dissection, a rule was made to lift and gently
            A ten-point strategy was devised to perform LC based on visible   pull the infundibulum to give it an appearance of Lord Ganesha
            anatomy on entering the abdomen; points were assigned as shown   or elephant head; seeing this sign, one point was assigned. If the
            in Table 1. After creating pneumoperitoneum and placement   Lord Ganesha sign was not there due to adhesions or obliteration
            for camera port, peritoneal cavity was properly inspected to   of Calot’s triangle, no point was assigned.
            rule out other pathology. Remaining ports were then placed,   In all the patients, these 10 points were collectively calculated,
            and a patient was positioned in slight right lateral and head up   and the three groups were made. In group I with 1–4 points, the
            position. Gallbladder fossa was inspected after removing or   surgery was considered risky; in group II with 5–7 points, the surgery
            retracting omentum and gut from the fossa. First, we examined   was considered somewhat risky; and in group III with 8–10 points,
            the CBD for proper visualization; three points were assigned if   the surgery was considered safe.
            surgery was expected to be performed safely. If the CBD was not
            visualized, no points were assigned. Presence of adhesions led to   results
            non-visualization of the CBD. If the CBD was visualized after the
            dissection of adhesion, three points were given. Based on the ease   Throughout the study, no significant complications were recorded.
            of dissection, adhesions were categorized as minimal and dense.   Tables 2 and 3 show age and sex distribution in all the three groups.
            The CBD is the most important duct that needs to be protected,   Table 4 shows various etiologies for which LC was performed.
            and its safety is paramount because most dreaded complication   Not a single case of conversion to OC was found. Complications
            of cholecystectomy is the CBD injury; thus, most weightage was   that occurred while performing the surgery and the subsequent
            given to the CBD by assigning three points. Second, Rouviere   treatments are discussed in Tables 4 and 5.
            sulcus was considered. If the dissection was possible above the   Complication were divided into intraoperative and
            sulcus, one point was given. If the sulcus was not visible due to   postoperative periods. No mortality occurred, and morbidity was
            adhesions or absence but safe dissection was possible by holding   negligible.
            the infundibulum/Hartman pouch, then one point was given.   Different variables were analyzed and compared considering
            Third, while holding the infundibulum/Hartman pouch, the   the three groups. Anatomical variations (Table 5 and Fig. 1), such as
            anatomy of cystic duct and artery and Calot’s triangle was assessed.   presence of adhesions, obliteration of Calot’s triangle, contracted
            Presence of aberrant artery or variations in cystic duct and artery   GB, presence of mucocele, and free-floating GB, were analyzed.
            were confirmed. If the two structures were seen entering GB on
            inspection, then one point was assigned. If there were variations   Table 2: Distribution of age according to three groups
            in anatomy or if the two structures were not visible clearly due                 Mean age
            to adhesion or variation, no point was assigned. Fourth, after   Total points  Mean  SD
            confirming the above parameters, dissection of the Calot’s triangle
            was initiated. Anterior dissection was initiated first in the majority of   1–4  34.51  12.06
            the patients to clear Calot’s triangle. It included dissection around   5–7  31.09   10.09
            the cystic duct and artery and lymph node (LN) of Lund while   8–10  32.72           11.64
            clearing the peritoneum and soft fibrofatty tissue around the duct
            and artery. Posterior dissection was similarly followed to dissect the   Table 3: Distribution of sex according to three groups
            peritoneum and soft fibrofatty tissue to clear the duct and artery.
            If the two structures were clearly visible and free of fibrofatty               Sex
            tissue, Calot’s triangle was considered cleared and two points   Total points  Male  (%)  Female  (%)
            were assigned. If due to adhesions or anatomical variation Calot’s   1–4  176  2.2  384     4.8
            triangle was not cleared as described, no point was assigned. Fifth,   5–7  392  4.9  640   8
            posterior dissection was extended further toward cholecystic plate.  8–10  2,352  29.4  4,056  50.7
                                                                Total     2,920     36.5      5,080    63.5
            Table 1: Ten-point distribution
            CBD visualized                   3                 Table 4: Diagnoses included in study
            Dissection above Rouviere sulcus  1                                          Group I   Group II   Group III
            Two structures entering into GB, cystic   1         Diagnoses                (1–4)   (5–7)    (8–10)
            duct, and cystic artery exposed                     Acute cholecystitis (ACC)  80    160       100
            Calot’s triangle clear           2                  Chronic cholecystitis (CCC)  400  320     1,120
            1/3 of cholecystic plate cleared  2                 Gallstone pancreatitis (GSP)  80  160      480
            Elephant head appearance         1                  Empyema (EMP)              0     320       640
            Total                           10                  Symptomatic GB stone (SGBS)  0    80       960
            1–4                             Low safety          Asymptomatic GB stone      0       0      1,360
            5–7                             Equivocal safety    (AGBS)
            8–10                            Safe cholecystectomy  GB polyp (GBP)           0       0      1,040



             56   World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 13 Issue 2 (May–August 2020)
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9