Page 95 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgeons
P. 95

Shalmali Alva
          reported: (1) acquisition of basic robotic skills, (2) increas-    7.  Huettner F, Pacheco PE, Doubet JL, Ryan MJ, Dynda DI,
          ing competence and the addition of more complicated     Crawford DL. One hundred and two consecutive robotic
          cases, and (3) achievement of robotic mastery, including   assisted minimally invasive colectomies-an outcome and
                                                                  technical update. J Gastrointest Surg 2011 Jul;15(7):1195-1204.
          the ability to tackle the most complicated cases. 24,32    8.  Cadeddu JA, Stoianovici D, Kavoussi LR. Robotics in urologic
             Robotic surgery, however, comes with higher costs    surgery. Urology 1997 Apr;49(4):501-507.
          than laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. 26,33-37  Of     9.  Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W.
          course, theoretically, potential benefits, such as func-  Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prosta-
          tional and oncologic ones are better in robotic rectal   tectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2007 Jan;51(1):45-55,
          surgery. But it may still not justify the higher costs at all   discussion 56.
          centers. As with all new advances in surgery, as robotics     10.  Lin S, Jiang HG, Chen ZH, Zhou SY, Liu XS, Yu JR.
                                                                  Meta-analysis of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treat-
          in surgery become more commonplace, the costs also      ment of rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2011 Dec;17(47):
          are bound to come down and make it more feasible to     5214-5220.
          be readily applied for a variety of procedures. As the     11.  Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG, Bressel M, Lynch AC.
          learning curve for robotic surgery is also shorter than   Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a
                                                                  meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2012 Jul;19(7):2095-2101.
          laparoscopic surgery, a bright future awaits widespread     12.  Ortiz-Oshiro E, Sanchez-Egido I, Moreno-Sierra J, Perez CF,
          robotics in surgery.                                    Diaz JS, Fernandez-Represa JA. Robotic assistance may
                                                                  reduce conversion to open in rectal carcinoma laparoscopic
          CONCLUSION                                              surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med
                                                                  Robot 2012 Sep;8(3):360-370.
          Robotic and laparoscopic colectomy have comparable     13.  Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP. Randomized
          intraoperative efficacy, with lesser conversion to open   clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic
          surgery seen in robotic-assisted cases. The postopera-  right colectomy. Br J Surg 2012 Sep;99(9):1219-1226.
          tive morbidity, duration of hospital stay, and need for     14.  Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N,
          patient-controlled analgesia are comparable in most cases   Sciannameo F, Gulla N, Noya G, Boselli C. Robotic resec-
          to laparoscopic surgery. In rectal cases, robotic surgery   tion compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer:
                                                                  systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.
          offers better operative expertise due to the presence   Colorectal Dis 2012 Apr;14(4):e134-e156.
          of narrow bony pelvis limiting laparoscopic surgery.     15.  Choi GS, Park IJ, Kang BM, Lim KH, Jun SH. A novel approach
          Robotic surgery has also proved effective in malignancy,   of robotic-assisted anterior resection with transanal or trans-
          as rates of positive circumferential margin are low and   vaginal retrieval of the specimen for colorectal cancer. Surg
          comparable to laparoscopic or open surgery. As the learn-  Endosc 2009 Dec;23(12):2831-2835.
          ing curve for robotic surgery is shorter than for laparo-    16.  Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Grand-
                                                                  erath FA. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the colon
          scopic surgery, and as the use of robotics becomes more   and rectum. Surg Endosc 2012 Jan;26(1):1-11.
          widespread, the cost of robotic surgery will also likely     17.  Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH. Telero-
          be affordable by all.                                   botic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for
                                                                  benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002 Dec;45(12):1689-94;
          REFERENCES                                              discussion 1695-1696.
                                                                18.  Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL.
            1.  D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G,    Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 2007
              Orsini C, Guidolin D. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for   Oct;21(10):1701-1708.
              treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 2004     19.  Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH. S052: a compari-
              Dec;47(12):2162-2168.                               son of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the
            2.  Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH, Kim H.   treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2011 Jan;25(1):240-248.
              Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal     20.  Kim NK, Kang J. Optimal total mesorectal excision for rectal
              cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative   cancer: the role of robotic surgery from an expert’s view.
              study. Ann Surg Oncol 2009 Jun;16(6):1480-1487.     J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2010 Dec;26(6):377-382.
            3.  Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E,     21.  Baek JH, Pastor C, Pigazzi A. Robotic and laparoscopic total
              Plana MN. Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdomi-  mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched study.
              nal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic   Surg Endosc 2011 Feb;25(2):521-525.
              review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2010 Aug;252(2):254-262.    22.  Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG,
            4.  Pigazzi A, Garcia-Aguilar J. Robotic colorectal surgery: for   Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B. Robotic versus laparo-
              whom and for what? Dis Colon Rectum 2010 Jul;53(7):969-970.  scopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a compara-
            5.  Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Crawford DL. Telerobotic   tive analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes.
              surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive   Surg Endosc 2010 Nov;24(11):2888-2894.
              cases. Surg Endosc 2006 Nov;20(11):1713-1718.     23.  Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Biancafarina A,
            6.  de Souza SL, Prasad LM, Park JJ, Marecik SJ, Blumetti J,   Casciola L. Short- and medium-term outcome of robotassisted
              Abcarian H. Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is   and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. JSLS 2009 Apr-
              there a role? Dis colon rectum 2010 Jul;53(7):1000-1006.  Jun;13(2):176-183.
          46
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100