Page 42 - WJOLS - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 42

Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery: A Mini Review
               Single incision laparoscopic surgery is gaining popularity   references
            due to its advantages in minimizing the invasiveness of surgical
            incisions. With the reduced number of incisions, the associated     1.  Dindo D, Demartines N, et al. Classification of surgical complications:
                                                                    a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and
            possible wound morbidities will also be reduced. This includes the   results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;204(2):205–213. DOI: 10.1097/01.
            reduced risks of wound infection, pain, bleeding, organ injury, and   sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
                        12
            port site hernia.  In addition, one important feature of SILS is that     2.  Azoury S, Farrow N, et al. Postoperative abdominal wound

            since the wound is at umbilicus, it leaves a single small scar that is   infection—epidemiology, risk factors, identification, and manage-
            well-hidden, it is almost unseen when the wound is healed, thereby   ment. Chronic Wound Care Manag Res 2015;2:137–148. DOI: 10.2147/
            it is almost “scarless”.                                CWCMR.S62514.
               In the beginning of SILS introduction, procedures were limited     3.  Vecchio R, MacFayden BV, et al. History of laparoscopic surgery.
                                                                    Panminerva Med 2000;42(1):67–90.
            to simple operations such as cholecystectomy and appendectomy.     4.  Haribhakti SP, Mistry JH. Techniques of laparoscopic cholecystectomy:
            With the increased experience of surgeons and better equipment   Nomenclature and selection. J Minim Access Surg 2015;1(2):113–118.
            features, SILS now can be practiced on more complex procedures   DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.140220.
            such as colon resections and bariatric surgery.      5.  Bruhat MA, Chapron C, et al. The benefit and risks of laparoscopic
               In general, SILS techniques take about the same amount of time   surgery (in French). Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 1993;88(2):84–88.
            as traditional laparoscopic surgeries. However, SILS is recognized     6.  Agha  R,  Muir  G.  Does  laparoscopic  surgery  spell  the  end  of
            as a more complicated procedure because it involves manipulating   the open surgeon? J R Soc Med 2003;96(11):544–546. DOI:
            three articulating instruments through one access port. From a   10.1177/014107680309601107.
            financial point of view, the use of a single-port device and the      7.  McCormack K, Scott NW, et al. Laparoscopic techniques vs open
                                                                    techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
            increased skills needed to perform, SILS is slightly more costly   2003(1):CD001785. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.
            compared to the conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery.     8.  Reichenbach DJ, Tackett AD, et al. Laparoscopic colon resection
            However, along with many benefits, SILS often offers overall   early in the learning curve. What is the appropriate setting?
            financial advantages to hospitals, patient’s healthcare insurance   Ann Surg 2006;243(6):730–737. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000220039.
            options, and employers, too. Typically, the patient’s hospital stay   26524.fa.
            is shorter as well as less medical assistance is needed compared to     9.  Khwaja HA, Bonanomi G. Bariatric surgery: techniques, outcomes and
            traditional laparoscopic surgeries.                     complications. Curr Anaest Crit Care 2010;21(1):31–38. DOI: 10.1016/
                                                                    j.cacc.2009.10.005.
               Although SILS offers desirable benefits for any wide variety of     10.  Budzynski A, Matlok M, et al. SILS (single incision laparoscopic
            patients undergoing abdominal surgery, not everyone is an applicant   surgery)—a new surgical approach to peritoneal cavity. Adv Med
            for the procedure. Obesity, severe adhesions, or scarring from   Sci 2011;56(1):18–24. DOI: 10.2478/v10039-011-0007-1.
            previous surgeries are a few of the factors that would prohibit patients     11.  Froghi F, Sodergren MH, et al. Single-incision Laparoscopic
            from undergoing this surgery. Nonetheless, new technologies are   Surgery (SILS) in general surgery: a review of current practice. Surg
            evolving continuously. The invention of new surgical tools will   Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2010;20(4):191–204. DOI: 10.1097/
            hopefully overcome the current obstacles in SILS in the future.  SLE.0b013e3181ed86c6.
                                                                 12.  Greaves N, Nicholson J. Single incision laparoscopic surgery in
                                                                    general surgery: a review. Ann R Coll Surg Eng 2011;93(6):437–440.
            concLusIon                                              DOI: 10.1308/003588411X590358.
            Single incision laparoscopic surgery is an exciting new approach in     13.  Hirano D, Minei S, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy for
            the field of laparoscopic surgery. Patients will recover uneventfully,   adrenal tumors via a single large port. J Endourol 2005;19(7):788–792.
                                                                    DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.788.
            with minimal postoperative pain, and with minimal scar almost     14.   Vidal O, Valentini M, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery
            unseen. The increased cost of the surgery is traded off by a shorter   appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2010;24(3):686–691. DOI: 10.1007/
            hospital stay and faster recovery.                      s00464-009-0661-6.





























            150   World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 11 Issue 3 (September–December 2018)
   37   38   39   40   41   42