Page 33 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 33

Retrocaval Ureter























            Fig. 3: Stone being retreived through rigid nephroscope  Fig. 4: Pyeloureterostomy being performed


            dIscussIon                                         Table 2: Results
            Retrocaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly and is also termed   Number of patients    5
                          7,8
            circumcaval ureter.  The proposed cause of this anomaly is that   Age (years)          33 (19–45)
            there is the persistence of the subcardinal vein as the infrarenal IVC,
            thus crossing anterior to the ureter in its midportion and resulting   Operative time (minute)  115 (90–130)
                               9
            in its circumcaval course.  It most commonly occurs on the right   Intraoperative blood loss (mL)  50 (45–80)
            ureter, and if it occurs on the left ureter, then it is usually associated
            with a duplicated IVC or situs inversus. 10,11  Retrocaval ureter   Hospitalization (days)  2.2 (2–4)
            may be identified incidentally on radiological imaging for some   Complications (modified Clavien–  One patient: Grade III:
                                             12
            other problems and can be asymptomatic.  Contrast-enhanced   Dindo)              Port-site incisional hernia)
            computed tomography scan of the abdomen is the investigation
                                        13
            of choice for the retrocaval ureter.  In symptomatic patients   ureter and associated renal calculi, if the renal scan is suggestive
            with documented renal functional obstruction, dismembered   of obstructed drainage and management of only calculi is not
            pyeloplasty or ureteroureterostomy or pyeloureterostomy, with   sufficient, simultaneous management of both the entities should
            or without the excision of the diseased segment, is the gold   be considered in the same sitting.
            standard treatment. 14,15  Baba et al. reported the first case of
            managing a circumcaval ureter laparoscopically by performing a
                                           16
            transperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty.  Surgical management   references
                                                     17
            is reserved for type I cases that are usually symptomatic.  Patients     1.  Heslin JE, Mamonas C. Retrocaval ureter: report of four cases and
            who are asymptomatic and have minimal calyceal dilation do not   review of literature. J Urol 1951;65(2):212–222. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-
            require surgical intervention although they should be followed up   5347(17)68477-5.
            carefully. 17,18  Few reports are mentioned in the literature describing     2.  Lutin EM, Haramati N, Frager D, et al. CT diagnosis of circumcaval
                                                                    ureter. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150(3):591–594. DOI: 10.2214/
            the simultaneous association of retrocaval ureter and renal calculi   ajr.150.3.591.
            and their management. Simultaneous treatment of renal stone and     3.  Olson RO, Austen G Jr. Postcaval ureter; report and discussion of a
            retrocaval ureter with laparoscopic technique has been reported   case with successful surgical repair. N Engl J Med 1950;242:963–968.
                           19
            by Simforoosh et al.  Mugiya et al. in their case report described   DOI: 10.1056/NEJM195006222422501.
            that simultaneous management of retrocaval ureter and upper     4.  Bateson EM, Atkinson D. Circumcaval ureter: a new classification.
                                                     20
            ureteric calculus was done during the same procedure.  Similarly,   Clin Radiol 1969;20(2):173–177. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(69)80166-2.
            Singh et al. also managed a case of retrocaval ureter and renal stone     5.  Kenawi MM, Williams DI. Circumcaval ureter. A case report of four
            by simultaneously performing a dismembered pyeloplasty and   cases in children with a review of literature and new classification.
                                                                    Br J Urol 1976;48(3):183–192. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1976.tb10197.x.
                        21
            pyelolithotomy.  Our experience of simultaneous management     6.  Zhang XD, Hou SK, Zhu JH, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of retrocaval
            of retrocaval ureter and stone is perhaps the largest to date.   ureter. Eur Urol 1990;18:207–210. DOI: 10.1159/000463911.
            We managed five such cases using both the laparoscopic and      7.  Dreyfuss W. Anomaly simulating a retrocaval ureter. J Urol
            endourology armamentarium with minimal complications (Tables 1   1959;82:630–632. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)65947-0.
            and 2). So, to conclude, a transperitoneal laparoscopic approach is     8.  Lerman I, Lerman S, Lerman F. Retrocaval ureter: report of a case.
            a good treatment option for managing both the retrocaval ureter   J Med Soc N J 1956;53:74–77. PMID: 13286686.
            and the associated stone disease. One of the reasons is that the     9.  Schulman CC. The ureter. In: O’Donnell B, Koff SA, editors. Pediatric
            transperitoneal approach gives one more freedom to maneuver   urology. 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1977. p. 409–410.
            the endoscopic instruments and also the accumulated irrigation     10.  Watanabe M, Kawamura S, Nakada T, et al. Left preureteral vena
                                                                    cava (retrocaval or circumcaval ureter) associated with partial
            fluid does not hinder the vision much. This could be a problem   situs inversus. J Urol 1991;145(5):1047–1048. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-
            with the retroperitoneal approach. In the presence of retrocaval   5347(17)38528-2.

                                                        World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 15 Issue 2 (May–August 2022)  129
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38