Page 42 - wjols
P. 42

COMMENTARY
            A Surgery on Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis Involving the

            Rectum: A Debate Started 100 Years Ago between Cullen and

            Sampson


            John L Yovich


             AbstrAct
             A recent randomized control trial reports at the 5 years postoperative stage for limited vs extended surgery involving the rectovaginal septum.
             For those gynecologists with advanced laparoscopy skills who have been reluctant to embrace the idea of complete bowel resections with
             reanastomosis, the study provides comfort in showing no difference in long-term outcomes between nodule excision and rectal resection.
             However, the study perpetuates the idea that all medical procedures have to be subjected to this type of statistical analysis, without any
             reference to the pioneers whose ideas formed the basis of current procedures as well as providing an understanding of the pathogenesis of the
             underlying disorder. The two gynecologists who first reported on the surgical management of this condition 100 years ago projected different
             ideas on pathogenesis as well as the appropriate surgical method to apply. Thomas Cullen and John Sampson should be acknowledged in any
             consideration of determining the appropriate procedure for this challenging disorder.
             Keywords: Adenomyosis, Advanced laparoscopic surgery, Bowel resection, Deep infiltrating endometriosis involving rectum DIER, Endometriosis.
             World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (2020): 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1400


            IntroductIon                                       PIVET Medical Centre, Perth Western Australia, Australia
            A recently reported randomized controlled study (RCT) regarding   Corresponding Author: John L Yovich, PIVET Medical Centre, Perth
            surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis involving the rectum   Western Australia, Australia, Phone: +61419906953, e-mail: jlyovich@
            (DIER) showed no significant difference in long-term outcomes   pivet.com.au
                                            1
            between nodule excision vs rectal resection.  The impressive study   How to cite this article:  Yovich JL. A Surgery on Deep Infiltrating
            is reporting at the 5 years postoperative stage but has not actually   Endometriosis Involving the Rectum: A Debate Started 100 Years Ago
            advanced either the understanding of the underlying disorder nor   between Cullen and Sampson. World J Lap Surg 2020;13(2):94–96.
            its proper management. In part, this is due to a failure to consider   Source of support: Nil

            historical aspects related to the two gynecologists who first   Conflict of interest: None
            reported on this disease, namely, Thomas Stephen Cullen (1868–
            1953) and John Albertson Sampson (1873–1946) and who expressed
            different views on its surgical management 100 years ago.  With respect to the specific surgical procedure for DIER,

            thomAs cullen                                      Cullen stated “The removal of an extensive adenomyoma of the
                                                               rectovaginal septum is infinitely more difficult than a hysterectomy
            Cullen graduated in Medicine in Toronto, Canada, in 1890, thereafter   for carcinoma of the cervix”. In tackling this disease, Cullen believed
            training as a gynecologist at the Johns Hopkins University 1891 but   that gynecologists should be trained as fully competent abdominal
            also spending time working as a pathologist in Gottingen, Germany,   surgeons.  He stated: “Where the lumen of the bowel is greatly
                                                                       3,4
            before returning to Johns Hopkins in 1893. However, the senior   narrowed, a complete segment of the rectum should be removed
            surgical position he had expected with Howard Kelly was deferred;   with the uterus, and an anastomosis should be made.” In such cases
            hence he established a pathology laboratory, becoming the first   “surgeons should perform a “preliminary permanent colostomy…
            Gynecological Pathologist in North America, while also practising   later the pelvic structures can be removed en bloc”. 4,5
            as a gynecologist in private practice. He eventually gained the   However, despite Cullen’s anatomical knowledge and surgical
            position as Head of Gynecology in 1919 after the retirement of Kelly   expertise, especially that involving bowel anastomoses, 3–5
            and had the title of Professor of Clinical Gynecology, a position he   he described some unpleasant complications that included
            held until retirement in 1939. Between 1894 and 1909, Cullen wrote   vesicovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas. In this pre-antibiotic era,
            four books on gynecological diseases that married histopathology   despite the advanced sterile surgical techniques practiced at the
            with clinical symptoms and signs, one of which was adenomyoma   Johns Hopkins Hospital, most of the women who had complications
                      2
            of the uterus.  Subsequently, in 1914, he published on the specific   died. 4,6
                                                      3
            subject of adenomyosis of the rectovaginal septum  as well
            as an accumulated experience in 2020 of his findings of extra-  John sAmpson

            uterine adenomyosis, detailing 10 sites that he had personally
                      4
            documented.  However, the worst cases were those involving the   Sampson’s experience overlaps with Cullen in that he graduated
            rectovaginal septum, numbering 19 in total, and which led to its   from Johns Hopkins in 1899 then proceeded into residency in
            eponymous title “Cullen’s Disease”.                gynecology under Howard Kelly through to 1906, a period when
            © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.
            org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to
            the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain
            Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44