Page 13 - Journal of WALS
P. 13

WJOLS

          10.5005/jp-journals-10007-1122
           REVIEW ARTICLE                                     Immunological Response of Postcholecystectomy: SILS vs NOTES
          Immunological Response of Postcholecystectomy:


            Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) vs

                  Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic

                                           Surgery (NOTES)



                                                             2
                                                 1 E Ray-Offor,  RK Mishra
                                1 Department of Surgery, University of Port-Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Nigeria
               2 Senior Consultant, Laparoscopic Surgeon, Professor in Minimal Access Surgery, Chairman and Director, World Laparoscopic
                                       Hospital Pvt Ltd, DLF Cyber City, Gurgaon, Haryana, India


          ABSTRACT
            Introduction: Surgery evokes complex metabolic, neuroendocrine and immunological responses. These are reparatory but when
            exaggerated may cause immunosuppression with morbidity and mortality. It is well-known that these responses are attenuated in
            laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which is the gold standard for treatment of cholelithiasis. Current novel minimal access techniques of
            natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) consolidate on the gains of
            better cosmesis, reduced postoperative pain and rapid recovery; however, they are yet to be fully evaluated in terms of comparative
            advantage on immunological basis.
            Aims: This study aims to compare the immunological changes following the techniques of NOTES and SILS in cholecystectomy with a
            view to ascribe relative advantage.
            Methods: Literature review of immunological changes following NOTES and SILS from Medline, Cochrane Database, Google and
            SpringerLink. Cross references from list of major articles on subject were read with other relevant journals from a laparoscopic
            research institute library.
            Results: Pneumoperitoneum affects the local peritoneal immune environment resulting in alterations in cytokine production and phagocytic
            function. Interleukin-1 (IL-1), tumor necrosis factor and particularly IL-6 are potent systemic mediators of the immune and acute phase
            response following surgery. Various animal model studies have shown that NOTES and SILS evoke similar levels of inflammatory
            cytokine profiles but for a late-phase tissue necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) depression with NOTES.
            Conclusion: Minimal access techniques of cholecystectomy have reduced immune response compared to open surgery. There is limited
            immunological data available comparing NOTES and SILS postcholecystectomy. Large randomized studies are needed to ascribe
            immunological advantage between these two techniques of cholecystectomy.
            Keywords: Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, NOTES, Immune response.





          INTRODUCTION                                        technique of gallbladder removal through a transluminal
                                                              endoscopic device. The first description of natural orifice
          Surgery evokes complex metabolic, neuroendocrine and  transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is credited to Kallo
          immunological responses. These are reparatory but when  et al.  This has evoked much enthusiasm with the prospect of
                                                                  6
          exaggerated may cause immunosuppression with morbidity and  consolidating on the gains of cosmesis, reduced postoperative
          mortality. It is well-known that these responses are attenuated  pain and rapid recovery. The need to compare the various
          in laparoscopic surgery. Cholelithiasis is a major cause of  aspects of both techniques thus exists.
          morbidity in the Western world with 500,000 and 21,000
          cholecystectomies performed annually in the USA and  AIMS
          Netherland respectively. 1,2  Open cholecystectomy was  This study is designed to compare the immunological responses
          popularized by Carl Langenbuch in the nineteenth century. 3  following the techniques of NOTES and SILS in chole-
          This practice has undergone a paradigm shift in the last two  cystectomy with a view to ascribe relative advantage.
          decades heralded by the efforts of Eric Muhe and Phillipe Mouret
          in 1985 and 1987 respectively, by performing laparoscopic  MATERIALS AND METHODS
                        4,5
          cholecystectomy.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is widely  Literature search was conducted using Medline, Cochrane
          accepted and presently the gold standard for the treatment of  database, Google and SpringerLink. Search words were “NOTES
          cholelithiasis. Conventionally, this procedure is carried out  surgery”, “single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy” and
          through four ports but more recently through a single incision  “immune response”. A selection criterion for further reading
          (SILS). Rapid advances in technology have led to a novel  was literature written in English language. Cross references,

          World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2011;4(2):85-88                                  85
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18